2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2003.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spontaneously hypertensive-rat as an animal model of ADHD: evidence for impulsive and non-impulsive subpopulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
119
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
13
119
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Noteworthy, this robust finding was obtained without the need of splitting the groups into halves, i.e. the most and least impulsive subgroups (see Adriani et al, 2003). Without such splitting, all the variability due to the presence of individual differences is loaded to the residual error, instead of the sub-population factor, and the ANOVA is hence much more conservative.…”
Section: Experiments 2: Delay-intolerance Task For Impulsivitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Noteworthy, this robust finding was obtained without the need of splitting the groups into halves, i.e. the most and least impulsive subgroups (see Adriani et al, 2003). Without such splitting, all the variability due to the presence of individual differences is loaded to the residual error, instead of the sub-population factor, and the ANOVA is hence much more conservative.…”
Section: Experiments 2: Delay-intolerance Task For Impulsivitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Notwithstanding the fact that most of SH rats belong to attentively-low phenotype, the population includes 19% of attentively-high rats. The heterogeneity could at least partially account for high variability of the ADHD-like behavior having been reported in SH rats [14,19,23] and the ED-test might be useful for obtaining of more robust results in the tests for exploratory behavior and attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ADHD-like pattern in SH rats, however, is not related to blood pressure level [15]. In SH rat, learning may be either enhanced or constrained across different tests [16][17][18] because the SH individuals are more impulsive [8,19,20] and less anxious [21,22] than normotensive animals. Some criticism comes from the fact that, in instrumental paradigms, variability in general activity also contribute to ADHDlike pattern typical for SH rats [23] suggesting the necessity of development of procedures that independently measure attention, cognitive performance and general activity in experimental animal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rats were continuously monitored for spontaneous home-cage locomotor activity [3,4] by means of an automatic device equipped with small passive infrared sensors placed on a standard rack over the top of each home-cage (ActiviScope system; TechnoSmart, Rome, Italy). These sensors (20 Hz) detected any movement of rats: scores were automatically divided into 60-min intervals.…”
Section: Circadian Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%