The SQUIRE Guidelines: an evaluation from the field, 5 years post release

Davies, Louise; Batalden, Paul B.; Davidoff, Frank; Stevens, David P.; Ogrinc, Greg

doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004116

“…19 Semistructured interviews and focus groups with 29 end-users of SQUIRE 1.0 revealed that many found SQUIRE 1.0 helpful in planning and doing improvement work, but less so in the writing process. This issue was especially apparent in efforts to write about the cyclic, iterative process that often occurs with improvement interventions.…”

Section: Squire 20 Developmental Pathmentioning

confidence: 99%

Squire 2.0 (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines From a Detailed Consensus Process

Ogrinc

¹

,

Davies

²

,

Goodman

³

et al. 2015

American Journal of Critical Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this manuscript, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) semistructured interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) two face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts, and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes the reporting of 3 key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value, and safety of health care: the use of formal and informal theory in planning, implementing, and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done; and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve health care, recognizing that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (www.squire-statement.org).

show abstract

“…In the evaluation of SQUIRE 1.0 19 and in the pilot testing, 22 many were perplexed by this item and its sub-elements. This item was intended to encourage a more formal assessment of the intervention and its associated outcomes.…”

Section: Studying the Intervention(s)mentioning

confidence: 99%

SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines from a Detailed Consensus Process

Ogrinc

¹

,

Davies

²

,

Batalden

³

et al. 2015

Canadian Journal of Diabetes

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

*This paper is co-published in BMJ Quality and Safety. Our goal in publishing the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines concurrently with BMJ and other journals is to ensure that this important information is disseminated to a wider audience. Minor differences exist between this version and the others to be consistent with AJMQ editorial style. AbstractIn the past several years, the science of health care improvement has advanced considerably. In this article, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) faceto-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts, and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes 3 key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value, and safety of health care: formal and informal theory in planning, implementing, and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done; and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve health care, recognizing that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (www.squire-statement.org).

show abstract

“…In the evaluation of SQUIRE 1.0 19 and in the pilot testing, 22 many were perplexed by this item and its sub-elements. This item was intended to encourage a more formal assessment of the intervention and its associated outcomes.…”

Section: Studying the Intervention(s)mentioning

confidence: 99%

SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines from a Detailed Consensus Process

Ogrinc

¹

,

Davies

²

,

Batalden

³

et al. 2015

The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

*This paper is co-published in BMJ Quality and Safety. Our goal in publishing the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines concurrently with BMJ and other journals is to ensure that this important information is disseminated to a wider audience. Minor differences exist between this version and the others to be consistent with AJMQ editorial style. AbstractIn the past several years, the science of health care improvement has advanced considerably. In this article, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) faceto-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts, and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes 3 key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value, and safety of health care: formal and informal theory in planning, implementing, and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done; and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve health care, recognizing that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (www.squire-statement.org).

show abstract

The SQUIRE Guidelines: an evaluation from the field, 5 years post release

Cited by 27 publications

References 13 publications

Squire 2.0 (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines From a Detailed Consensus Process

Squire 2.0 (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines From a Detailed Consensus Process

SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines from a Detailed Consensus Process

SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines from a Detailed Consensus Process

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About