2006
DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stability and Reliability of Self-Reported Drinking Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensitivity analyses using a measure of 3+ glasses consumed at a frequency of 'a few times a month' yielded results consistent with those presented in this paper. In addition, existing evidence suggests that validity and reliability of self-reported drinking measures like those used in this stud are generally reasonable ([Del Boca and Darkes, 2003] and [Gruenewald and Johnson, 2006]). Neverth future studies with greater capacity to assess patterns of alcohol consumption during pregnancy should assess the risk associated with more frequent exposure to alcohol consumption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Sensitivity analyses using a measure of 3+ glasses consumed at a frequency of 'a few times a month' yielded results consistent with those presented in this paper. In addition, existing evidence suggests that validity and reliability of self-reported drinking measures like those used in this stud are generally reasonable ([Del Boca and Darkes, 2003] and [Gruenewald and Johnson, 2006]). Neverth future studies with greater capacity to assess patterns of alcohol consumption during pregnancy should assess the risk associated with more frequent exposure to alcohol consumption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Thus, the inherent imprecision in a single measurement of both lifestyle factors and telomere length may non-differentially influence the observed estimates of association. However, good short-term reliability in measurement of telomere length over a period of months has been demonstrated (64), and longitudinal panel studies have also demonstrated some degree of stability in lifestyle factors measured in adult populations (65)(66)(67)(68)(69)(70)(71).…”
Section: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(2) February 2016mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model fits were good, with an average R 2 value of .98. Drinking measures derived from this procedure exhibit good reliability (Gruenewald & Johnson, 2006). These procedures provided estimates of F, V, Q, F(Q > k), and variance in drinking quantities for every drinker in the sample.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 95%