2014
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The stability and structure of primordial reservoirs in the lower mantle: insights from models of thermochemical convection in three-dimensional spherical geometry

Abstract: S U M M A R YLarge-scale chemical lateral heterogeneities are inferred in the Earth's lowermost mantle by seismological studies. We explore the model space of thermochemical convection that can maintain reservoirs of dense material for a long period of time, by using similar analysis in 3-D spherical geometry. In this study, we focus on the parameters thought to be important in controlling the stability and structure of primordial dense reservoirs in the lower mantle, including the chemical density contrast be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
82
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(114 reference statements)
7
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, the deep dense layer is predicted to remain stable beyond thermal equilibration; negative compositional buoyancy is sufficient for stabilization. Persistent separation of the mantle into two, or more, layers persists as a critical buoyancy number B = Δρcomp / ρ0αTCMB (with Δρcomp the density difference between layers) of ~0.3 is exceeded (Li et al, 2014b;Tosi et al, 2013). These B are exceeded in all our models with fractional crystallization.…”
Section: Fractional Crystallization Of the Momentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In any case, the deep dense layer is predicted to remain stable beyond thermal equilibration; negative compositional buoyancy is sufficient for stabilization. Persistent separation of the mantle into two, or more, layers persists as a critical buoyancy number B = Δρcomp / ρ0αTCMB (with Δρcomp the density difference between layers) of ~0.3 is exceeded (Li et al, 2014b;Tosi et al, 2013). These B are exceeded in all our models with fractional crystallization.…”
Section: Fractional Crystallization Of the Momentioning
confidence: 78%
“…As an initial condition a dense layer with a thickness of 300 km encircles the core (Fig. 1a) which fits the shape of LLSVPs and explains the location of hotspots best (Li et al 2014). Deformation height of the dense layer was characterized by the elevation parameter dh (measured from the surface of the initial dense layer), which was defined by the concentration value of c = 0.5.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…To estimate the relative influence of iron spin transition compared to other controlling parameters, we further varied the buoyancy ratio, which has been found to be the main parameter controlling the stability of reservoirs of dense material (e.g., Deschamps & Tackley, 2009;Li et al, 2014a;McNamara & Zhong, 2004). To estimate the relative influence of iron spin transition compared to other controlling parameters, we further varied the buoyancy ratio, which has been found to be the main parameter controlling the stability of reservoirs of dense material (e.g., Deschamps & Tackley, 2009;Li et al, 2014a;McNamara & Zhong, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%