1985
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(85)90383-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The stability of CuO and Cu2O surfaces during argon sputtering studied by XPS and AES

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
88
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
13
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting from the standard spectrum from the pristine CuO powder, both the binding and satellites were fitted to two peaks. The peak position at 933.4 eV is attributed to the covalent part of Cu 2+ binding in the CuO phase [38,42,44], and the other peak at 934.9 eV is due to the ionic Cu 2+ binding [45,46]. This is in excellent agreement with well-documented literature reports that there exist two kinds of Cu 2+ binding in pristine CuO.…”
Section: Xps Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Starting from the standard spectrum from the pristine CuO powder, both the binding and satellites were fitted to two peaks. The peak position at 933.4 eV is attributed to the covalent part of Cu 2+ binding in the CuO phase [38,42,44], and the other peak at 934.9 eV is due to the ionic Cu 2+ binding [45,46]. This is in excellent agreement with well-documented literature reports that there exist two kinds of Cu 2+ binding in pristine CuO.…”
Section: Xps Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It is noted that each spectrum is nearly the same as that of pristine CuO powder, which suggests that the monoclinic CuO phase dictates the microstructures of all of the thin films deposited with different levels of oxygen in the sputtering gas. The presence of a series of satellite peaks is characteristic of CuO which has a d 9 configuration in the ground state [42][43][44][45]. Furthermore, the energetic difference (DE) between the E Cu2p3/2 and E Cu2p1/2 peaks is 20 ± 0.1 eV, which is in good agreement with literature data.…”
Section: Xps Analysissupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The surface spectra differ from those further down in the coating and agree well with references of CuO [33]. The spectra obtained from inside of the coating are less oxidized, but due to potential sputter damage on CuO [34] the oxidation state of the Cu cannot be determined. However, the presence of CuO is expected since Cu 2 O preferentially forms at relatively low temperatures [35].…”
Section: Heat Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Among them are oxygen adsorbed at the copper surface, which gives the rise to an O1s feature at 529.7 eV, copper(I) oxide (530.4 eV), copper(II) oxide (529.6 eV), methoxy-(530.2 ± 0.2 eV) and formate-groups (531.4 ± 0.2 eV) [22,[56][57][58][59]. Selection between these species requires analysis of a whole set of XPS spectra: not only O1s and Cu2p, but also C1s and CuLVV Auger spectra should be analyzed.…”
Section: Methanol Oxidation Over Coppermentioning
confidence: 99%