2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The stabilization and release performances of curcumin-loaded liposomes coated by high and low molecular weight chitosan

Abstract: A comprehensive stability evaluation for curcumin-loaded liposomes (Cur-LP) coated by low (LCS) or high (HCS) molecular weight chitosan with three gradient concentrations (L: low; M: medium; H: high) was the main objective of this study. Apart from leading to a higher encapsulation efficiency (> 90%), all chitosan-coated Cur-LP displayed an improved stability with respect to resistant to salt, sunlight, heat, accelerated centrifugation and long-term storage at 4 °C. Increasing the molecular weight and concentr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
41
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(41 reference statements)
7
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tai et al (2019) recently formulated curcumin-loaded liposomal nanoparticles (Cur-LP) with the same objective. In order to improve drug bioavailability, the research coated liposome nanoparticles with high molecular weight chitosan to enhance stability and maintain the release capacity of Cur-LP [12]. Nevertheless, various designed nanoparticles shared common concerns: they exhibited low stability, whereas the release profile was inconsistent and uncontrollable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tai et al (2019) recently formulated curcumin-loaded liposomal nanoparticles (Cur-LP) with the same objective. In order to improve drug bioavailability, the research coated liposome nanoparticles with high molecular weight chitosan to enhance stability and maintain the release capacity of Cur-LP [12]. Nevertheless, various designed nanoparticles shared common concerns: they exhibited low stability, whereas the release profile was inconsistent and uncontrollable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5A shows that there was no obvious release from both free ANT and ANT-NPs during mouth digestion, which may be due to the short exposure process and the absence of some specic enzymes. 33 The retention rate of the ANT (96.24%) in ANT-NPs was clearly higher than that of free ANT (88.21%) when the samples were subjected to gastric digestion for 1 h. The retention rate of the ANT-NPs was more than 92%, while that of the free ANT was only 76% at the end of the gastric digestion period, which is signicantly lower than those obtained from the ANT-NPs. Moreover, the retention rate of free ANT decreased rapidly to 38.52%, while that of ANT-NPs was 79.13% aer simulated intestinal digestion.…”
Section: 31mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…To date, liposome polymeric coating is carried out through conventional methods such as the simple incubation of a liposomal suspension with a polymeric solution [ 74 , 75 ] or through the dropwise method, which in the early 1990s was explored for the coating of liposomes with chitosan [ 76 ], is still the most popular form for the production of these carrier systems. The strategy involves the dropwise addition of a polymeric solution, through the use of a syringe pump, to a preformed liposomal suspension, while stirring [ 77 ], or, on the contrary, the polymeric solution is added drop by drop to a previously produced liposome solution [ 78 ].…”
Section: Innovations and Performances Of Production Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, the technique has led to the production of coated liposomes, mainly of the chitosan polymer, for the delivery of various active molecules such as indomethacin [ 79 ], clotrimazole [ 80 ], resveratrol [ 81 ], doxorubicin [ 56 , 82 ] quercetin [ 83 ], proteins [ 84 , 85 ], curcumin [ 78 ], and other therapeutics [ 86 , 87 ], but the fabrication processes have remained at the bench-scale, leading to the production of restricted volumes in output. In addition to the low productivity, being a bulk technique, it is also characterized by a poor control over the final features of the covered lipid vesicles and requires high energy and long periods of time for process.…”
Section: Innovations and Performances Of Production Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%