1966
DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(66)90028-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The stabilization mechanism of lifted diffusion flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
115
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
115
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The oldest considers the base of the flame as a premixture of fuel and oxidizer. The burning velocity of this mixture equals the flow velocity at the flame base [4]. Peters and Williams [5], however, have argued that no sufficient premixing of the reactants can take place for this concept to be valid, in accordance with experimental results of Pitts [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The oldest considers the base of the flame as a premixture of fuel and oxidizer. The burning velocity of this mixture equals the flow velocity at the flame base [4]. Peters and Williams [5], however, have argued that no sufficient premixing of the reactants can take place for this concept to be valid, in accordance with experimental results of Pitts [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This theory can be used to describe the threshold behavior of the liftoff of the flame by means of the probability of burning [10]. This concept leads to a liftoff condition involving both a percolation threshold P~ and a probability of burning Pb [5] J°b = Pc (4) at a radial position where the mean mixture fraction f is stoichiometric f = fst. If Eq.…”
Section: Modeling Of the Liftoff Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location of the flame base is governed by the premixed nature of the fuel air mixture. Computational models using this criterion were able to predict lift-off heights for the jet fires considered [15]. Experimentalists were also able to correlate measured lift-off heights for a range of fuels using the premixed assumption and the turbulent burning velocity, [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to the approach of Vanquickenborne and Van Tiggelen [40] and Kalghatgi [36], who balanced a turbulent burning velocity against the velocity of the oncoming gas. The latter also presented a dimensionless correlation for the lift-off distance that involves S L , the maximum laminar burning velocity of the fuel-air mixture under atmospheric conditions.…”
Section: The U* Parametermentioning
confidence: 64%