2017
DOI: 10.2140/gt.2017.21.2231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The stable cohomology of the Satake compactification of 𝒜g

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Charney and Lee [7] have shown that the rational cohomology of the Satake-Baily-Borel compactification A bb g of Ag stabilizes as g → ∞ and they computed this stable cohomology as a Hopf algebra. We give a relatively simple algebrogeometric proof of their theorem and show that this stable cohomology comes with a mixed Hodge structure of which we determine the Hodge numbers. We find that the mixed Hodge structure on the primitive cohomology in degrees 4r + 2 with r ≥ 1 is an extension of Q(−2r − 1) by… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the results of [Hai02] there is a non-algebraic class (it has a wrong Tate twist) in H 6 (A Sat 3 ), which is likely to be α 3 , and it follows from the results of [HT12] that there is also a non-algebraic class in H 8 (A Sat 4 ), which is likely to be α 3 λ 1 . Furthermore, Chen and Looijenga [ChL15] recently proved that all α i are of Hodge type (0, 0), which in particular implies that they are not algebraic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the results of [Hai02] there is a non-algebraic class (it has a wrong Tate twist) in H 6 (A Sat 3 ), which is likely to be α 3 , and it follows from the results of [HT12] that there is also a non-algebraic class in H 8 (A Sat 4 ), which is likely to be α 3 λ 1 . Furthermore, Chen and Looijenga [ChL15] recently proved that all α i are of Hodge type (0, 0), which in particular implies that they are not algebraic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of the fact that Charney and Lee replace A Sat g with its Q-homology equivalent space |W g |, the geometric meaning of the x-and y-classes remains unclear. This gives rise to the following two questions: [22]. Basically, in their paper they succeed in redoing Charney-Lee's proof using only algebro-geometric constructions.…”
Section: Stabilization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one considers the Hopf algebra structure of stable cohomology of A Sat g , the primitive part in degree 4r + 2 is generated by y 4r+2 and the Goresky-Pardon lift ch GP 2r+1 of the Chern character, which is a degree 2r + 1 polynomial in the λ GP j with j ≤ 2r + 1. The proof of Theorem 24 is based on an explicit computation of the Hodge structures on this primitive part ([78, Theorem 5.1]) obtained by using the theory of Beilinson regulator and the explicit description of the y-generators given in [22]. This amounts to describing H 4r+2 (A Sat g , Q) prim as an extension of a weight 4r + 2 Hodge structure generated by ch GP 2r+1 by a weight 0 Hodge structure, generated by y 4r+2 .…”
Section: Stabilization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. Chen and Looijenga proved in [CL16] that these classes have Hodge weight zero, and thus are non-algebraic. Thus the stable cohomology of A Sat g contains non-trivial Tate extensions, and we refer the reader to the recent preprint [Loo15] for a discussion of these extensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%