2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ohx.2019.e00067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stalker: An open source force meter for rapid stalk strength phenotyping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such loading conditions produce natural failure types and failure patterns in plant specimens (i.e., failure occurs at the cross-section with the least optimal allocation of structural tissue). Several devices have been recently developed which accomplish this task (Grafius and Brown, 1954; Berry et al ., 2003; Guo et al ., 2018, 2019; Erndwein et al ., 2019; Heuschele et al ., 2019). In particular, they utilize the natural anchoring of the maize roots and apply a point load to a cross-section near the ear (very similar to the loading profile shown in Figure 7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such loading conditions produce natural failure types and failure patterns in plant specimens (i.e., failure occurs at the cross-section with the least optimal allocation of structural tissue). Several devices have been recently developed which accomplish this task (Grafius and Brown, 1954; Berry et al ., 2003; Guo et al ., 2018, 2019; Erndwein et al ., 2019; Heuschele et al ., 2019). In particular, they utilize the natural anchoring of the maize roots and apply a point load to a cross-section near the ear (very similar to the loading profile shown in Figure 7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) carefully remove the leaf sheath while ensuring no damage has occurred to the stem, (4) re-test the stem without the leaf sheath for 10 cycles using the same three-point bending test setup as before, (5) the difference in flexural rigidity of the sample with and without the leaf sheath is a reasonable estimate of the difference in stalk bending strength. It should be noted that several field-based phenotyping devices capable of measuring flexural rigidity have been developed and that these devices could be used in place of the universal testing system utilized in the current study (Cook et al, 2019 ; Heuschele et al, 2019 ; Erndwein et al, 2020 ). However, if field-based phenotyping methods are employed the grain head should either be removed prior to testing or alternatively the grain head should be weighed and the effect of the grain weight on bending strength and flexural rigidity measurements should be accounted for as outlined in Stubbs et al ( 2020a ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, this device was modified by another group to reduce the weight and continuously record data as plants are bent (Fig. 3B, Table 1; Heuschele et al, 2019). This updated device, called the Stalker, was created to differentiate between different management practices in wheat and between different small grains (i.e., wheat, oat, and barley); however, the paper does not report the results of these trials (Heuschele et al, 2019).…”
Section: Mechanical Methods To Evaluate Stalk Lodgingmentioning
confidence: 99%