1995
DOI: 10.1016/1352-2310(94)00210-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The standard error of a weighted mean concentration—I. Bootstrapping vs other methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate associations between different size categories and environmental conditions, weighted averages for all categories were plotted for organic matter content and mean shear stress. Standard errors of weighted averages were calculated following Cochran (1977), as suggested by Gatz and Smith (1995). LOI and mean shear stress were chosen among the other environmental factors based on biological knowledge and lack of collinearity, which was likely due to different levels of precision in the estimation, i.e., LOI values were measured in the field and therefore better reflected local variability, while mean shear stress values were estimated on larger areas by models that did not account for factors locally modifying the hydrodynamic regime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate associations between different size categories and environmental conditions, weighted averages for all categories were plotted for organic matter content and mean shear stress. Standard errors of weighted averages were calculated following Cochran (1977), as suggested by Gatz and Smith (1995). LOI and mean shear stress were chosen among the other environmental factors based on biological knowledge and lack of collinearity, which was likely due to different levels of precision in the estimation, i.e., LOI values were measured in the field and therefore better reflected local variability, while mean shear stress values were estimated on larger areas by models that did not account for factors locally modifying the hydrodynamic regime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depth of capture was reported from soundings recorded at the time of net recovery. We estimated standard errors around weighted means according to Cochran (1977), a method that provides similar estimates of variance around weighted means to those of more intensive bootstrapping estimation methods (Gatz and Smith 1995). Comparisons of weighted mean depth of whiteWsh capture and thermocline depth between invaded versus non-invaded years were performed with t tests assuming unequal variance using the Welch modiWcation of degrees of freedom (Zar 1999).…”
Section: Depth Of Benthic Invertebrates and Lake Whitewshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to an unbalanced number of observation months on different individuals, the reported means and standard errors were weighted by the number of observation months for each individual and season. Weighted standard errors were estimated according to Cochrane (1977) following Gatz & Smith (1995). We used linear mixed models (LMM) to evaluate effects of sex and season on distance to nearest home range border and the spatial clustering of dens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%