1997
DOI: 10.1006/jcht.1997.0206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The standard molar enthalpies of formation of BaO(g) and SrO(g)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SrO and BaO have been previously reviewed. 8 For SrO, the heat of formation is within the experimental 8,67 error bars of ±4 kcal/mol and very similar to the value derived in a review from spectroscopic measurements. 8 For BaO, the calculated heat of formation is in very good agreement with the experiment; within the ±1.9 kcal/mol error bar for the more negative experimental value, 67 and is significantly more negative than the average value given in a review.…”
Section: The Experimental Heats Of Formation and The Corresponding Bosupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…SrO and BaO have been previously reviewed. 8 For SrO, the heat of formation is within the experimental 8,67 error bars of ±4 kcal/mol and very similar to the value derived in a review from spectroscopic measurements. 8 For BaO, the calculated heat of formation is in very good agreement with the experiment; within the ±1.9 kcal/mol error bar for the more negative experimental value, 67 and is significantly more negative than the average value given in a review.…”
Section: The Experimental Heats Of Formation and The Corresponding Bosupporting
confidence: 86%
“…8 For BaO, the calculated heat of formation is in very good agreement with the experiment, within the ±1.9 kcal/mol error bar for the more negative experimental value, 67 and it is significantly more negative than the average value given in a review. 8 Thus, we suggest that the experimental value for the heat of formation from thermodynamic Knudsen cell measurements of BaO be further examined, and we confirm the value for SrO derived from the spectroscopic information. The heats of formation of SrF and BaF are in excellent agreement with experiment 67 considering the ±2 kcal/mol error bars from experiment.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the QZ level, there is reasonably good agreement with available experimental data. [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][73][74][75][76][77] In the absence of experimental data for FrH and RaH, the present results can be compared to theoretical results of Koga et al, 22 which also used CCSD(T) with a DKH3 Hamiltonian. These NOSeC-CV-qzp results fall somewhere between the cc-pwCVTZ-DK and cc-pwCVQZ-DK values of the present work, suggesting that the NOSeC-CV sets also converge slowly towards the CBS limit, potentially overestimating r e and underestimating D e .…”
Section: Scalar Relativistic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%