The standards of practice for delivery of polypharmacy and chronic disease medication reviews by general practice clinical pharmacists: a consensus study

Abstract

Background General practice in the UK is experiencing a crisis. Greater multidisciplinary working is a potential solution. The new general practice contract in Scotland encourages this and includes a new pharmacotherapy service to be delivered by General Practice Clinical Pharmacists (GPCPs). Consensus is lacking for the standards of practice for delivery of pharmacotherapy medication reviews (which are polypharmacy and chronic medication reviews) as part of this service. Aim To identify and validate standards of practice for polypharmacy and chronic disease medication (pharmacotherapy level 3) reviews conducted by GPCPs. Method A two-phased mixed-methods consensus methodology was used. Phase 1: An expert group of GPCPs (n = 4) and clinical pharmacist managers (n = 2) responsible for delivering the pharmacotherapy service used a Modified Nominal Group Technique to generate potential standards. Phase 2: Two-round Delphi survey involving GPCPs with ≥ 1 year of experience of working in general practice (n = 159). Results The expert group identified 44 potential standards of practice for polypharmacy and chronic disease reviews. Practicing GPCPs indicated during the Delphi phase that the 44 standards were applicable to practice. The standards of practice covered seven main categories: skills, environment, qualifications, qualities and behaviours, knowledge, process and experience. Conclusion Practicing GPCPs indicated that the standards identified by the expert group are acceptable and valid for current practice and the delivery of polypharmacy and chronic medication reviews. The application of these standards to practice may help GPCPs and general practices to ensure equitable delivery of patient care.

What makes a multidisciplinary medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people work well in primary care? A realist review and synthesis

“…There is a need for a deprescribing competency framework to help define responsibilities against capabilities and skills. Work on this has already begun, for example a curricular framework for an interprofessional approach to deprescribing [ 76 ], standards of practice for polypharmacy and chronic disease medication reviews in general practice [ 77 ] have been developed, and a deprescribing competency framework in nursing for older people is also under development [ 78 ]. Using competency frameworks to allocate roles within the MDT team regarding deprescribing decisions could be beneficial however more research is needed in this area.…”

Construction of a pharmaceutical care mode for cancer pain patients in primary care based on the Delphi method: an effective analysis

“…4.1 Scientific nature of the pharmaceutical care mode for cancer pain patients in primary care based on the Delphi method As a mature and reliable method that has been widely applied in the field of health services, the Delphi method is often used in the formulation of models and standards (Boulkedid et al, 2011). On the basis of the Delphi method, Katie et al (Earle-Payne et al, 2022) identified 44 practice standards for general clinical pharmacists to provide multiple medications and chronic disease drug treatment reviews and proved that such standards were acceptable and effective. Therefore, in this study, we used the Delphi method to construct a set of pharmaceutical care modes that could be suitable for cancer pain patients at the primary healthcare level in China.…”

Addressing the Second Victim Phenomenon among Community Pharmacists and Its Impact on Clinical Pharmacy Practice: A Consensus Study

“…The research highlighted that from standards of practice [35] often lead to SV experiences among pharmacists. SVP additionally erodes self-esteem and willingness to accept responsibility for complex interventions, which can be a barrier to the implementation of advanced services like medication reviews [36].…”