Schools in Transition 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6300-827-3_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The State, Market and Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Removing barriers is not the same thing as building opportunities, and therefore removing tuition fees or entrance examinations as barriers to access does not necessarily promote equity if it leads to assimilation policies. Kontio and Sailer (2017) argue that the legitimation of the educational system should include the idea of allowing each individual to cultivate and reach their full potential. Securing sufficient financial aid to manage tuition fees and living costs, for example with money provided by institutional scholarships or government loans, can be a way to enable students to realize their potential in education.…”
Section: Misconceptions About Equity In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Removing barriers is not the same thing as building opportunities, and therefore removing tuition fees or entrance examinations as barriers to access does not necessarily promote equity if it leads to assimilation policies. Kontio and Sailer (2017) argue that the legitimation of the educational system should include the idea of allowing each individual to cultivate and reach their full potential. Securing sufficient financial aid to manage tuition fees and living costs, for example with money provided by institutional scholarships or government loans, can be a way to enable students to realize their potential in education.…”
Section: Misconceptions About Equity In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is implemented in Finland through tuition-free education, and in the United Kingdom and Australia through loans and institutional scholarships for students. According to Kontio and Sailer (2017), using taxes for educational investment can be an effective way of achieving a more equal income distribution from the rich to the poor. As Table 3 indicates, Finland invests more public resources in higher education than either the United Kingdom or Australia.…”
Section: Misconceptions About Equity In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%