“…When applied to low Pt concentrations, conventional fluorescence measurements using solid-state detectors have been widely used to study Pt in its different phases and complexes using both XANES and EXAFS analyses (e.g., [24][25][26][27]). However, conventional fluorescence-as well as transmission-mode XAS [16,[28][29][30] are rather limited as to the discrimination between Pt II and Pt IV , or among different atomic neighbors (e.g., S vs. Cl, O vs. N) in similar types of solids (e.g., Pt II S vs. Pt IV S 2 ) or aqueous complexes (e.g., Pt(HS) n vs. PtCl n ). Compared to conventional fluorescence, HERFD was commonly applied only to XANES analyses, for which it presents numerous benefits: (i) it enables a far better XANES shape definition and may reveal pre-edge and post-edge features that are poorly resolved (if detectable at all) in conventional mode (e.g., [31][32][33][34][35][36]); (ii) it is more sensitive to the presence of light elements whose presence affects HERFD-XANES spectra (e.g., H in Pt catalytic materials; [26]) and more discriminative for neighbors with close atomic numbers or monomeric vs. polymeric ligands of the same element (e.g., HS − vs. S 3 − ; [18,37]); (iii) it allows elimination of unwanted fluorescence signals from other elements with edges close to that of Pt [38], such as tungsten (W-L II edge; 11,544 eV), gold (Au L III -edge; 11,919 eV), arsenic (As-K edge; 11,867 eV), tantalum (Ta-L I edge; 11,682 eV), or rhenium (Re-L II edge; 11,959 eV).…”