2016
DOI: 10.1134/s0013873816070162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The state of the art of biospeleology in Russia and other countries of the former Soviet Union: a review of the cave (endogean) invertebrate fauna. 1. Introduction—crustacea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a rule, in cave associations, crustaceans lead in number and diversity, forming the basis of the food pyramid of these communities. The relatively sparse data from the karst regions of the Caucasus indicate the extreme richness of the fauna of 37 troglobiotic crustaceans (about 50 endemic species in the Caucasus are known) (see review in Turbanov and Marin, 2015;Turbanov et al, 2016). At the moment, both the habitation of a larger number of species, and the wider distribution of this group in the Caucasus are assumed (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a rule, in cave associations, crustaceans lead in number and diversity, forming the basis of the food pyramid of these communities. The relatively sparse data from the karst regions of the Caucasus indicate the extreme richness of the fauna of 37 troglobiotic crustaceans (about 50 endemic species in the Caucasus are known) (see review in Turbanov and Marin, 2015;Turbanov et al, 2016). At the moment, both the habitation of a larger number of species, and the wider distribution of this group in the Caucasus are assumed (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the moment, both the habitation of a larger number of species, and the wider distribution of this group in the Caucasus are assumed (e.g. Sadowsky, 1930;Birštein, 1939Birštein, , 1948Juzbaš'jan, 1940;Sendra and Reboleira, 2012;Marin and Sokolova, 2014;Turbanov et al, 2016). At the same time, subterranean fauna is characterized by a large number of endemics (local endemism), due to special ecological conditions and isolated location and low potential for dispersal (see Sket and Zakšek, 2009 Sadowsky, 1930 (6 species) and Troglocaris s. str.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the great number of caves in the area (some estimates give 300), until now only the invertebrate fauna of the caves Kaptarhana, Gap-Gotan, Hashym Oyuk and Gulshirin, an unnamed cave near v. Svincovyi rudnik, have been explored from the biological viewpoint (Birstein and Ljovuschkin 1965, Ljovuschkin 1969, Starobogatov 1972, Kniss 2001, Turbanov et al 2016a. Kniss (2001) reviewed the existing knowledge in his catalogue "Fauna of the caves of Russia and adjacent countries" and Turbanov et al (2016a, b, c) provided a checklist of all cave species known from Russia and the former Soviet republics.…”
Section: Biogeographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-"Lartetia" sp. Recorded from the Bolshaya Kazachebrodskaya (= Verkhne-Mzymtinskaya) Cave, Adlersky City District, Greater Sochi, Krasnodar Province (Birstein, 1950), but actually it seems to concern one of the Transcaucasian species of Paladilhiopsis (Turbanov et al, 2016a).…”
Section: The Russian Great Caucasusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stygobiont, described from a spring inside the Pionerskaya (= Ushchel'naya) Cave in the upper reaches of Vostochnaya (= Bolshaya) Khosta River, Khostinsky City District, Greater Sochi, Krasnodar Province. Reported also from caves in Abkhazia (Starobogatov, 1962;Chertoprud et al, 2016;Vinarski, Kantor, 2016, Turbanov et al, 2016a, but with some minor differences from the typical form. Phylum Arthropoda Siebold, 1848 Subphylum Crustacea Brünnich, 1772 Class Copepoda Milne-Edwards, 1840…”
Section: The Russian Great Caucasusmentioning
confidence: 99%