2000 International Conference on Simulation Semiconductor Processes and Devices (Cat. No.00TH8502)
DOI: 10.1109/sispad.2000.871194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The state of the art in interconnect simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculation of R, C, and L matrices of a multi-port, multi-conductor interconnect requires a numerical or field solver approach, which solves Maxwell's electromagnetic field equations, with initial and boundary conditions [8,9]. The choice of numerical techniques to solve the partial differential equations includes the finite difference method (FD), the finite element method (FE), and the boundary element method (BEM) etc [8,9].…”
Section: Interconnect Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculation of R, C, and L matrices of a multi-port, multi-conductor interconnect requires a numerical or field solver approach, which solves Maxwell's electromagnetic field equations, with initial and boundary conditions [8,9]. The choice of numerical techniques to solve the partial differential equations includes the finite difference method (FD), the finite element method (FE), and the boundary element method (BEM) etc [8,9].…”
Section: Interconnect Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of numerical techniques to solve the partial differential equations includes the finite difference method (FD), the finite element method (FE), and the boundary element method (BEM) etc [8,9]. Both public-domain and commercial tools are available that are based on all these methods [8].…”
Section: Interconnect Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9. The limiting step in the characterization is solving the Maxwell equation to get the numerical results, but here substantial progress has been made as well [18].…”
Section: The Parameterized 3d-modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%