1999
DOI: 10.1353/rhe.1999.0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The States and Higher Education Legislative Views on the Governance of Public Colleges and Universities: Enhancing the Public Interest

Abstract: The mass media's role in shaping public policy remains the focus of intensive research among political science and communication scholars. Yet virtually nothing is known about media coverage of state higher education policy making. Using mass communication theory, this study analyzes press coverage of an appropriations conflict between two nationally prominent universities. Its purpose was to determine whether newspapers give preferential treatment to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies recognized the need for statewide coordination of higher education (Banta, Rudolph, Van, & Fisher, 1996;Marcus, 1997;Epper, 1997;Martinez, 1999;Welsh, 2002). Several researchers explained that the coordination worked best when: (a) it was evaluated for contemporary needs (Epper, 1997); (b) policy allowed for flexibility at campus-level implementation (Mills, 1998); and (c) communication existed among state-level and campuslevel leadership (Colbeck, 2002).…”
Section: Private Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies recognized the need for statewide coordination of higher education (Banta, Rudolph, Van, & Fisher, 1996;Marcus, 1997;Epper, 1997;Martinez, 1999;Welsh, 2002). Several researchers explained that the coordination worked best when: (a) it was evaluated for contemporary needs (Epper, 1997); (b) policy allowed for flexibility at campus-level implementation (Mills, 1998); and (c) communication existed among state-level and campuslevel leadership (Colbeck, 2002).…”
Section: Private Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bureaucratic logic, in which many public universities operate, involves significantly different levels of organizational autonomy. Relative to the academy logic, the state plays a larger role in the operations of universities existing in the bureaucratic logic: beyond providing base funding, the state specifies goals and objectives for the university to achieve (see, e.g., Martinez ). In addition, the bureaucratic logic results in specialized organizational structures that differentiate faculty and professionalized management.…”
Section: Organizational Autonomy and Assumptions Of Faculty And Adminmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in line with the "market logic" (Clark 1986;Leslie and Johnson 1974) developed in contrast with the "academy" one and the "bureaucratic" one. The "academy" logic underlines the autonomy and self-governance of universities, with the State only taking a "funder" role; the "bureaucratic" logic, instead, encourages the State to play a larger role, by specifying higher education institutions' goals and objectives (Martinez 1999).…”
Section: The Entrepreneurial Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%