2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The statistical interpretation of the strength of float glass for structural applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each type of glass, ten 300 mm 9 300 mm 9 6 mm specimens were tested with the tin side under tension, while the residual compression stresses from the heat treatment were measured by SCALP-04 and SCALP-05 devices. For the pristine annealed glass strength, the authors record a value of the 50% fractile of the order of 101 MPa, indeed a value much lower than the one (161 MPa) that can be calculated from the data analyzed in a previous work, 22 corresponding to a standard commercial glass. We do not know if this datum has been erroneously reported in Zaccaria and Overend, 38 but in any case, although the average of the surface residual stresses for the fully tempered glass was 117 MPa with standard deviation 7 MPa, the mean failure stress value was found to be 288 MPa, a value much higher than what should be expected from a formula of the type (7).…”
Section: Zaccaria and Overendmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For each type of glass, ten 300 mm 9 300 mm 9 6 mm specimens were tested with the tin side under tension, while the residual compression stresses from the heat treatment were measured by SCALP-04 and SCALP-05 devices. For the pristine annealed glass strength, the authors record a value of the 50% fractile of the order of 101 MPa, indeed a value much lower than the one (161 MPa) that can be calculated from the data analyzed in a previous work, 22 corresponding to a standard commercial glass. We do not know if this datum has been erroneously reported in Zaccaria and Overend, 38 but in any case, although the average of the surface residual stresses for the fully tempered glass was 117 MPa with standard deviation 7 MPa, the mean failure stress value was found to be 288 MPa, a value much higher than what should be expected from a formula of the type (7).…”
Section: Zaccaria and Overendmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…ie, m =7.3 and normalη0=406 Mpa mm2false/m. On the other hand, the dashed and the dotted curves are associated with the experimental data from the campaign by the CEN TC129/WG8 group, for which the statistical parameters were estimated in both graphically ( m =6.46 and normalη0=419.6 Mpa mm2false/m) and analytically through the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) method ( m =5.62 and normalη0=589 Mpa mm2false/m). Such parameters take into account the effective area Aeff of the specimen according to the expressions (3) and (4).…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The probability density function for the action is given by Equation (15). Since two concurrent actions exist, from Equations (16) and (20), the verification formula for the case at hand can be expressed in the form with k mod,per = 0.26, k mod,s = 0.39, f g,k = 45 MPa, n = 16, and A = 1.36. Then, the characteristic value of the snow load q s is obtained from the expression recorded in Ref.…”
Section: Snow Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%