1977
DOI: 10.1016/0041-1647(77)90087-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The statistical properties of freeway traffic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, mirroring real-world traffic dynamics in this setting is very challenging compared to freeways. For example, the arrival events on freeways were shown to approximately follow a renewal process under low-to-moderate flows (Breiman et al, 1977;Luttinen, 1996), and can thus be modeled using solely an inter-arrival or headway distribution (Ha et al, 2012;Hoogendoorn, 2005). In an urban context, under all conditions, one should study events in conjunction with other processes mainly at intersections, e.g., the inter-relations between arrival and departure processes and signal dynamics (Luttinen, 1996;Zheng et al, 2017).…”
Section: Modeling Traffic Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In any case, mirroring real-world traffic dynamics in this setting is very challenging compared to freeways. For example, the arrival events on freeways were shown to approximately follow a renewal process under low-to-moderate flows (Breiman et al, 1977;Luttinen, 1996), and can thus be modeled using solely an inter-arrival or headway distribution (Ha et al, 2012;Hoogendoorn, 2005). In an urban context, under all conditions, one should study events in conjunction with other processes mainly at intersections, e.g., the inter-relations between arrival and departure processes and signal dynamics (Luttinen, 1996;Zheng et al, 2017).…”
Section: Modeling Traffic Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the strong interest for the statistical properties of noise in image and signal processing (e.g., Foi et al, 2008;Liu et al, 2014), relatively few studies (Chen et al, 2008;Ghosh et al, 2010;Guo et al, 2015;Guo & Williams, 2012;Huang et al, 2018;Thomas et al, 2008;Tsekeris & Stathopoulos, 2006) investigate the noise properties and volatility in traffic measurements. Although there is evidence that the amount of random variation depends on the underlying (systematic) flow (e.g., Breiman et al, 1977;Chen et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2008;Luttinen, 1996;Thomas et al, 2010), many estimation and prediction methods (e.g., Wang & Papageorgiou, 2005) assume white Gaussian noise. We cite some exceptions: Li and Rose (2011), Thomas et al (2010), Wagner-Muns et al (2018 on traffic volumes, and Nantes et al (2015), Tang et al (2018), andYang et al (2010) on travel times.…”
Section: Noise Level Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation