2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-014-0113-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The status of AFLP in the genomics era and a pipeline for converting AFLPs into single-locus markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, reliance was placed on an established AFLP platform, which has been used extensively for the genetic analysis of globe artichoke , Mauro et al 2012, Mauro et al 2015. While now generally superseded by other DNA-based marker systems (particularly those targeting single base variants), AFLP technology still remains a convenient and informative platform for marker assisted breeding, particularly for small-scale programs which cannot afford the capital investment needed for assaying single nucleotide polymorphisms (Zhang et al 2014), while the re-sequencing of many individuals in most situations is unnecessary and would inflate the costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, reliance was placed on an established AFLP platform, which has been used extensively for the genetic analysis of globe artichoke , Mauro et al 2012, Mauro et al 2015. While now generally superseded by other DNA-based marker systems (particularly those targeting single base variants), AFLP technology still remains a convenient and informative platform for marker assisted breeding, particularly for small-scale programs which cannot afford the capital investment needed for assaying single nucleotide polymorphisms (Zhang et al 2014), while the re-sequencing of many individuals in most situations is unnecessary and would inflate the costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of okra, several molecular markers have been used for germplasm characterization, e.g., random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD; Martinello, Leal, Amaral Júnior, Pereira, & Daher, 2003), inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR; Yuan et al, 2014), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP; Kyriakopoulou et al, 2014), and simple sequence repeats (SSR; Kumar et al, 2017a). The AFLP markers, in spite of being dominant, have several advantages, such as broad genome coverage, cost-effectiveness, reproducibility, and independence of sequence information (Zhang, van Parijs, & Xiao, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our method, the key of controlling the number of DNA fragments is selective PCR amplification. Compared to the size selection strategy (using regular laboratory electrophoresis equipment), using selective PCR to control the number of baits is easier to manipulate and more repeatable (Zhang et al, ). In the selective PCR step of this study, each reaction contains a pair of selective primers with a single selective nucleotide at the 3’ end (e.g., MluI‐F‐SA/ SbfI‐R‐SC), which can theoretically amplify one‐sixteenth of the total digestion fragments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) technique was established as a highly efficient genomic fingerprinting method in 1995 (Vos et al, ). Because the AFLP method is suited for fingerprinting genomic DNA of any origin and complexity, it has been widely used for applications in genetic analysis such as addressing genetic relationship, displaying population structure, and assessing genetic diversity (Mueller & Wolfenbarger, ; Vuylsteke, Peleman, & van Eijk, ; Zhang, van Parijs, & Xiao, ). The AFLP technology is based on selective PCR amplification of restriction fragments from the digested genomic DNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%