2020
DOI: 10.26719/2020.26.1.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The status of tobacco control in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: progress in the implementation of the MPOWER measures

Abstract: This review examines the current status of implementation of the MPOWER measures in the countries of the Region and the resulting regional population coverage for these measures. It considers how policies have changed in EMR Member States over time and considers these results in relation to tobacco trend reports published in 2015 and 2018. Methods Data for MPOWER achievement at the country level were taken from the relevant published editions of the biennial WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic (hereafter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike this study, several previous studies conducted in GCC countries [ 26 , 27 , 33 , 34 ] focused more on the implementation of the MPOWER package that includes measures targeting the demand-side of tobacco such as raising tobacco taxes, enforcing smoke-free, offering cessation for those who want to quit, educating people about the harmful use of tobacco, and banning tobacco marketing activities. Although these studies reported the advancement of implementing FCTC measures in GCC countries, none of them have assessed the implementation of supply-reduction measures [ 26 , 27 , 33 , 34 ]. Due to the little support given by global consensus toward policies targeting the supply of tobacco, there is a scant amount of literature focusing on supply-reduction measures and their effectiveness on tobacco use compared to demand-reduction measures [ 17 , 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike this study, several previous studies conducted in GCC countries [ 26 , 27 , 33 , 34 ] focused more on the implementation of the MPOWER package that includes measures targeting the demand-side of tobacco such as raising tobacco taxes, enforcing smoke-free, offering cessation for those who want to quit, educating people about the harmful use of tobacco, and banning tobacco marketing activities. Although these studies reported the advancement of implementing FCTC measures in GCC countries, none of them have assessed the implementation of supply-reduction measures [ 26 , 27 , 33 , 34 ]. Due to the little support given by global consensus toward policies targeting the supply of tobacco, there is a scant amount of literature focusing on supply-reduction measures and their effectiveness on tobacco use compared to demand-reduction measures [ 17 , 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 49 Also, the MPOWER program introduced by WHO in 2008 with funding from The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and The Bloomberg Philanthropies has been effective in promoting tobacco demand reduction policies. 34–36 , 50 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 6 , 32 Provisions of the FCTC that set targets for the speed of implementation of health warning labels and TAPS restrictions (Articles 11 [HWL 8 , 9 , 33 ] and 13 [TAPS] 7 ) are the most implemented 32 while taxation measures lag behind. 11 , 34 The FCTC accelerated the adoption of smoke-free policies, 10 , 33 but they remained the least implemented measure among 22 Eastern Mediterranean countries. 35 , 36 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 A growing body of evidence globally, including that from LMICs, clearly demonstrate that tobacco taxes are a powerful tool for reducing tobacco use while providing a reliable source of government revenues. 4 The Eastern Mediterranean region has the lowest average prices of tobacco products among all WHO regions, 5 and is the only region for which smoking prevalence has been projected to increase by 2025. 6 Tobacco product prices are an important factor when considering that decreasing affordability is the most effective strategy to reduce the uptake of smoking among young people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%