The status–power arena: a comprehensive agent-based model of social status dynamics and gender in groups of children

Abstract

Despite the urgency of this issue, AI still struggles to represent social life. This article presents a comprehensive agent-based model that investigates status-power dynamics in groups. Kemper's sociological status-power theory of social relationships, and a literature review on school children in middle youth, is its basis. The model allows us to investigate causation of the near-ubiquitous phenomenon that females have lower social status on average than males. Possible causes included in the model are children's dispositional traits (kindness, beauty, and physical power), schoolyard culture (social acceptability of fighting), behavioural strategy (amount of rough-and-tumble play) and the balance between public and dyadic sources of status. An agent-based model of a virtual schoolyard was created in which the children assemble in changing groups and mutually confer status. The status conferred upon a child modifies the status it holds. Rough-and-tumble is modelled as ambiguous: it is intended as a status conferral, but may be perceived as a power move. Running many trials of the model we found that in time, depending on the parameter settings, a gender-based status gap emerged. Rough-and-tumble play had more impact on emergent status differences than did physical power differences. Social acceptability of fighting also strongly moderated the resulting status gap. Placing more weight on dyadic relationship could alleviate status loss. All these model behaviours are in line with empirical findings of child behaviour studies at schools. They have face validity for social status issues in the adult world. We conclude from this that this kind of agent-based model merits use in studying the status-power dynamics of other issues in child behaviour, or indeed in social behaviour in general.

A Weighted Balance Model of Opinion Hyperpolarization

“…While complex network structures can generate hyperpolarization in low dimensional spaces [see 21], our model shows that there is no need to assume any particular network structure to generate hyperpolarization, even for cases with many opinion dimensions and random noise. However, this does not mean that network dynamics do not play a role in polarization dynamics, as previous models have shown the interplay between hierarchical network structures and opinion dynamics [44,45,46]. Future empirical research should focus on identifying how opinions and social networks influence each other in group experiments.…”

To Stay or Not to Stay? Artificial Sociality in GRASP World

“…The fact that differences in group behaviour are culture-mediated is also borne out by studies among children showing that for them too, the probability of leaving a group varies with individualism and power distance [16,17].…”

How to measure intersexual dominance?

“…Also, in crickets, males that previously won a conflict were more likely to attack a female than males that had not fought (Adamo and Hoy, 1995), suggesting the winnerloser effect can be carried over from intrasexual to intersexual conflicts. Besides, in some agent-based models, where the winner-loser effect is made to operate both within and between the sexes, patterns emerge that resemble empirical patterns (Hemelrijk et al, 2017;Hofstede et al, 2018). Therefore, the winner-loser effect may be functioning in interactions between the sexes as well as within a sex.…”