1996
DOI: 10.1086/176828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stellar Halo of M104. I. A Survey for Planetary Nebulae and the Planetary Nebula Luminosity Function Distance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observations at optical wavelengths have identified globular clusters and planetary nebulae in M104 (VanDalfsen et al 2001;Larsen, Forbes, & Brodie 2001;Ford et al 1996). We searched for coincidences between these catalogs and our Chandra sources.…”
Section: Source Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Observations at optical wavelengths have identified globular clusters and planetary nebulae in M104 (VanDalfsen et al 2001;Larsen, Forbes, & Brodie 2001;Ford et al 1996). We searched for coincidences between these catalogs and our Chandra sources.…”
Section: Source Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With two of 12 Magellanic Cloud SSSs associated with nebulae, and with $1000 SSSs predicted in galaxies such as M31, we might expect there to be dozens of such associations. The nebulae could be and would likely be included among PNe lists by surveys using the methodology that Ford et al (1996) used to identify PNe in M104 (Di Stefano, Paerels, & Rappaport 1995). Because only a small fraction of all SSSs can be detected, the number of observable PNe/very soft sources may be only 1%-10% of the number of physical associations.…”
Section: Relationship Between Very Soft Sources and Planetary Nebulaementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1 shows the location of the M104 clusters from the 3 studies; it can be seen that our 2dF data extend out to ∼20 arcmin radius (50 kpc for a distance of 9 Mpc; [4]), much further out than previous studies. ; Crosses: Keck GCs [7].…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…DF thanks the ARC for financial support. 8.9 ± 0.6 LF (PNLF) (Ford et al 1996) Adopted distance 29.77 ± 0.03 9.0 ± 0.1 Weighted average of to Sombrero SBF & PNLF …”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%