2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19378-6_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stellar Kinematics of Extragalactic Bulges

Abstract: Galactic bulges are complex systems. Once thought to be small-scale versions of elliptical galaxies, advances in astronomical instrumentation (spectroscopy in particular) has revealed a wealth of photometric and kinematic substructure in otherwise simple-looking components. This review provides an overview of how our perspective on galactic bulges has changed over the years. While it is mainly focused on aspects related to the dynamical state of their stars, there will be natural connections to other propertie… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
(177 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the JAM approach, two basic assumptions are made for the stellar population: a constant velocity anisotropy (βz = 1 − σ 2 z /σ 2 R ) and a constant dynamical mass-tolight ratio (Υ dyn ). The parameters βz and Υ dyn have been defined after fitting the observed second-order velocity moment Vrms = √ V 2 + σ 2 calculated from the stellar kinematics of the galaxies (Falcón- Barroso et al 2016). The best-fit model of the observed Vrms, the corresponding fitting parameters (βz and Υ dyn ), and their uncertainties are obtained by applying the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method as described in Kalinova et al (2017b).…”
Section: Dynamical Models Circular Velocity Curves and Orbital Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the JAM approach, two basic assumptions are made for the stellar population: a constant velocity anisotropy (βz = 1 − σ 2 z /σ 2 R ) and a constant dynamical mass-tolight ratio (Υ dyn ). The parameters βz and Υ dyn have been defined after fitting the observed second-order velocity moment Vrms = √ V 2 + σ 2 calculated from the stellar kinematics of the galaxies (Falcón- Barroso et al 2016). The best-fit model of the observed Vrms, the corresponding fitting parameters (βz and Υ dyn ), and their uncertainties are obtained by applying the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method as described in Kalinova et al (2017b).…”
Section: Dynamical Models Circular Velocity Curves and Orbital Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We notice that higher order GH coefficients h k 1,l (m=3,4) have larger values when 3 < |∆V /σ| < 5, while h k 1,l = 0 (m=3,4) keeps for orbit k. Thus including higher order of GH coefficient h 3,l , h 4,l helps to distinguish these two orbits. However, the quality of CALIFA data can only provide realiable h m,l (m=1,2) (Falcón- Barroso et al 2016).…”
Section: A2 Option Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A radial anisotropy of stellar velocity dispersion would be difficult to identify and to interpret as evidence of recent AGN activity due to difficulties in modelling stellar orbits and their anisotropies in external galaxies (Cappellari et al 2013;Falcón-Barroso 2016). Nevertheless, we predict that galaxies showing evidence of recent AGN activity, such as hot gas bubbles on galactic outskirts (analogous to the Fermi bubbles, Su et al 2010) or young stars very close to the nucleus (analogous to the disc of young stars in the Galactic centre, Paumard et al 2006) may also have radiallybiased stellar velocity dispersions.…”
Section: Kinematics Of Young Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%