“…The scale demonstrated strong face, content, and construct validity, reliability, and internal consistency, with good model fit statistics, significant factor loadings, and moderate correlation coefficients (inter-item and interscale). The resulting conceptualization of stigma is consistent with our prior qualitative work, existing theoretical frameworks, and other health-related stigma measures (Atuyambe et al, 2005; Berger et al, 2001; Cockrill et al, 2013; Garnets, Herek, & Levy, 2003; Goffman, 1963; Hall, Manu, et al, 2015; Hatzenbuehler et al, 2013; Herek, 1993; Herrman & Waterhouse, 2011; Holzemer et al, 2007; Kalichman et al, 2009; Kelly, 1996; Levandowski et al, 2012; Link et al, 2004; Martin et al, 2014; Norris et al, 2011; Nybade & MacQuarrie, 2006; Ritsher et al, 2003; Shellenberg et al, 2014; Turan et al, 2012; USAID, 2005; Van Brakel, 2006; Wiemann et al, 2005). …”