2013
DOI: 10.1363/4507913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stigma of Having an Abortion: Development of a Scale and Characteristics of Women Experiencing Abortion Stigma

Abstract: This valid and reliable scale can be used in research examining abortion stigma and related outcomes (e.g., women's health, relationships and behavior). The scale can also be used to evaluate programs and interventions that aim to reduce the stigma experienced by women who have abortions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

13
177
1
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
13
177
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The scale demonstrated strong face, content, and construct validity, reliability, and internal consistency, with good model fit statistics, significant factor loadings, and moderate correlation coefficients (inter-item and interscale). The resulting conceptualization of stigma is consistent with our prior qualitative work, existing theoretical frameworks, and other health-related stigma measures (Atuyambe et al, 2005; Berger et al, 2001; Cockrill et al, 2013; Garnets, Herek, & Levy, 2003; Goffman, 1963; Hall, Manu, et al, 2015; Hatzenbuehler et al, 2013; Herek, 1993; Herrman & Waterhouse, 2011; Holzemer et al, 2007; Kalichman et al, 2009; Kelly, 1996; Levandowski et al, 2012; Link et al, 2004; Martin et al, 2014; Norris et al, 2011; Nybade & MacQuarrie, 2006; Ritsher et al, 2003; Shellenberg et al, 2014; Turan et al, 2012; USAID, 2005; Van Brakel, 2006; Wiemann et al, 2005). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The scale demonstrated strong face, content, and construct validity, reliability, and internal consistency, with good model fit statistics, significant factor loadings, and moderate correlation coefficients (inter-item and interscale). The resulting conceptualization of stigma is consistent with our prior qualitative work, existing theoretical frameworks, and other health-related stigma measures (Atuyambe et al, 2005; Berger et al, 2001; Cockrill et al, 2013; Garnets, Herek, & Levy, 2003; Goffman, 1963; Hall, Manu, et al, 2015; Hatzenbuehler et al, 2013; Herek, 1993; Herrman & Waterhouse, 2011; Holzemer et al, 2007; Kalichman et al, 2009; Kelly, 1996; Levandowski et al, 2012; Link et al, 2004; Martin et al, 2014; Norris et al, 2011; Nybade & MacQuarrie, 2006; Ritsher et al, 2003; Shellenberg et al, 2014; Turan et al, 2012; USAID, 2005; Van Brakel, 2006; Wiemann et al, 2005). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Not surprisingly and in line with prior abortion research, the highest levels of perceived stigma were noted for abortion (Cockrill et al, 2013; Shellenberg et al, 2014). Yet we also found high perceived stigma around sex, pregnancy, and childbearing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The vast majority of abortion procedures take place in the first trimester, but 8.5% are performed in the second trimester, which is a lengthier, more expensive, higher risk procedure with less availability of doctors performing the procedure and in fewer geographic areas (Jones & Kooistra, 2011). Both repeat and second trimester abortions carry social stigma and expense for the women needing them (Cockrill, et al, 2013;Norris et al, 2011), but little is known about what would be helpful for prevention of repeat unwanted pregnancies and/or delays in obtaining an abortion. Further, women are often stigmatized after disclosing partner violence, creating an additional set of psychological barriers for receipt of services (Maier, 2012;Thapar-Bjorkert & Morgan, 2010), which intensifies the need for both universal partner screening in health centers as well as provider training for conducting effective screening and responses to disclosures (Colarossi, Breitbart, & Betancourt, 2010b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%