1973
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90148-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stiles-Crawford effect—explanation and consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
130
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3d). We also applied our algorithm to cones and found it to match perfectly previous results for light propagation along these cells 23,[40][41][42] , which were obtained and examined by other methods such as coupled mode theory 22,[43][44][45] .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3d). We also applied our algorithm to cones and found it to match perfectly previous results for light propagation along these cells 23,[40][41][42] , which were obtained and examined by other methods such as coupled mode theory 22,[43][44][45] .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In order to calculate light propagation through the Müller data-cube, we have developed 11 and applied a known algorithm, the fast Fourier transform beam propagation method (FFT BPM) [17][18][19][20][21] . This is a direct three-dimensional (3D) numerical solution of the wave equation, also known as the scalar Helmholtz equation 22,23 :…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At a given wavelength the angular sensitivity of single cones is determined by the waveguide properties, which in turn depend on two main factors: the relative index of refraction of the intracellular and extracellular spaces and the physical diameter of the cones. 3,39 Thus the angular tuning of a region of retina will depend on these two factors plus the variance in the orientation of the group of cones being measured. In general, neither the exact values of the appropriate indices of refraction nor the proper shape and size of the cone aperture are known (see Rowe and Pugh 40 ).…”
Section: B Is There Photoreceptor Disarray In the Central Retina?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context it is remarkable that there is no evidence to suggest violations of Grassmann's laws for oblique incidence if the reference primaries and the test traverse the same part of the pupil. Thus the physiology may well be one of metameric matching in this latter instance and hypothesis completely explaining these matches by physical events at the level of photon absorption in the photoreceptor outer segment (Brindley, 1953;Walraven & Bouman, 1960;Snyder & Pask, 1973;Fuld, Wooten & Katz, 1979;Alpern, 1979) are by no means excluded as a class. Consider the alternative, consistent with (ii) above, that all effects of oblique incidence occur at a stage where the effects of radiations of different wave-lengths are no longer compounded by simple linear laws.…”
Section: Saturation Of Obliq Uel Y Incident Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%