2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41556-021-00659-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The STING phase-separator suppresses innate immune signalling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study showed that STING can condensate into puzzle-like structures in the ER via liquid-liquid phase separation of soluble proteins. These biomolecular condensates limit the immune response to pathogen invasion by sequestering STING and TBK1 [75]. Formation of biomolecular condensates was dependent on cGAMP levels suggesting a level of feedback regulation to prevent pathway overactivation.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Cgas Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study showed that STING can condensate into puzzle-like structures in the ER via liquid-liquid phase separation of soluble proteins. These biomolecular condensates limit the immune response to pathogen invasion by sequestering STING and TBK1 [75]. Formation of biomolecular condensates was dependent on cGAMP levels suggesting a level of feedback regulation to prevent pathway overactivation.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Cgas Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important N-terminal domain in cGAS is responsible for maintaining the liquid phase of dsDNA and cGAS. The non-specific ion interaction between the positively charged N-terminal of cGAS and the structural contact between the C site and dsDNA enforce cGAS/DNA liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) ( 7 ), which is beneficial for dimerization and protects DNA from the degradation of three-prime repair exonuclease 1 (TREX1) to promote cGAS activity ( 8 ).…”
Section: Overview Of the Cgas/sting Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, a phase separation-deficient but catalytic domain-intact cGAS mutant requires much higher DNA concentrations to initiate its activity (Du and Chen, 2018). cGAS condensates thus promote non-linear signal amplification (Brandman and Meyer, 2008), yielding a switch-like response consistent with the sensitive detection of cytosolic dsDNA (Yu et al, 2021b;Zhou et al, 2021). Overall, LLPS regulates cGAS function through compartmentation and creates a biochemical environment that favors DNA-induced activation of cGAS.…”
Section: Mechanistic Principles Of Signaling Condensates: the Cgas-sting Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as TREX1 diffuses slowly into the cGAS core, the biochemical environment within the core condensate further suppresses enzymatic activity of TREX1 (Zhou et al, 2021). Recently, STING was also reported to form biomolecular condensates on the ER membrane, triggered by cGAMP binding and mediated by its IDR and dimerization domain (Yu et al, 2021b). STING condensates were shown to compartmentalize both its negative regulator TANK binding protein 1 and its activator cGAMP, thereby buffering cGAMP concentrations to modulate immune signaling strength (Yu et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Mechanistic Principles Of Signaling Condensates: the Cgas-sting Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%