2006
DOI: 10.1353/ajp.2006.0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Strangeness of the Phaedrus

Abstract: My focus is on the polemical and argumentative force of Plato"s characterization of Socrates in the Phaedrus. His Socrates celebrates the irrational in this dialogue, in a wide variety of forms and manifestations, in direct response to the intellectual sterility so attractive to the interlocutor Phaedrus. Only in the particular context of, e.g., the written speech of Lysias and Phaedrus" enthusiasm for it can we make sense of what Plato"s Socrates says here and of the structure of the dialogue as a whole.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One should therefore be careful not to assume too quickly that Derrida's enquiry into reason's origin (which is to be clearly distinguished from an opposition to reason) amounts to a 'performative inconsistency' as contended for example by Solum [38, p. 484]. 37 Socrates was as we saw, similarly seduced out of the city, but by 'writing'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One should therefore be careful not to assume too quickly that Derrida's enquiry into reason's origin (which is to be clearly distinguished from an opposition to reason) amounts to a 'performative inconsistency' as contended for example by Solum [38, p. 484]. 37 Socrates was as we saw, similarly seduced out of the city, but by 'writing'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Before being tamed to become the loyal son and the truth by Plato, logos is thus a wild ambivalent creature which can enter and bewitch the soul with 'the power to break in, to carry off, to seduce internally, to ravish invisibly' [18, p. 118]. 37 If logos is viewed thus, it would of course make of Socrates (the spokesman of the father, the one who does not write) a magician and a sophist, a pharmakeus par excellence, something which he shares with Thoth, and as we will see now, also with Eros [18, pp. 94, 119, 147].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…David Schenker, while describing this conversion, rightly claims that 'Socrates/Plato has laid bare the shallowness and shortcomings of traditional rhetorical education and has offered a sort of divinely inspired philosophy in its place.' 24 To think of Plato, without considering the divine inspiration of philosophy, is to transform Plato into an earthly rhetorician like those he condemned. Phaedrus say to Socrates 'friends have everything in common' thus recognizing their community and Socrates ends the dialogue by saying 'let's be off.'…”
Section: And Who Are You Going With?mentioning
confidence: 99%