2020
DOI: 10.1108/jbim-02-2020-0101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The strategic role of corporate online references: building social capital through signaling in business networks

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to conceptualize corporate reference management as a strategic signaling activity in business networks. While research has extensively outlined how firms develop and maintain social capital through business-to-business (B2B) relationships, less is known about how they signal their participation in business networks to develop this social capital. Therefore, this paper conceptualizes B2B references, in particular corporate online references (COR), as a tool through which firms “borrow” a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(193 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The descriptive analysis of the items of the constructs is presented in Table 5. The items [commitment (Krause et al , 2006; Koufteros et al , 2006; Lee and Ha, 2018; Scheinbaum and Wang, 2018; Shaikh et al , 2019; Tóth et al , 2020), socialization (Lee and Dawes, 2005; Bowey and Easton, 2007), obligation/reciprocity (Lee and Dawes, 2005; Krause et al , 2006; Lawson et al , 2007; Bowey and Easton, 2007; Lee and Ha, 2018; Shaikh et al , 2019), trust (Krause et al , 2006; Lee and Ha, 2018; Scheinbaum and Wang, 2018), dependence (Perrone et al , 2003; McEvily and Marcus, 2005), cost (Macduffie, 1995; Krause et al , 2006), quality (Krause et al , 2006; Badawi and Battor, 2020), delivery (Krause et al , 2006), flexibility (Krause et al , 2006) and innovativeness (Koufteros et al , 2006; Li et al , 2016)] were measured using a five-item scale adapted according to the sources presented in Table 2. Figure 3 shows the supposed influence of the dependence between the actions of the relational SC on the buyer’s OP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The descriptive analysis of the items of the constructs is presented in Table 5. The items [commitment (Krause et al , 2006; Koufteros et al , 2006; Lee and Ha, 2018; Scheinbaum and Wang, 2018; Shaikh et al , 2019; Tóth et al , 2020), socialization (Lee and Dawes, 2005; Bowey and Easton, 2007), obligation/reciprocity (Lee and Dawes, 2005; Krause et al , 2006; Lawson et al , 2007; Bowey and Easton, 2007; Lee and Ha, 2018; Shaikh et al , 2019), trust (Krause et al , 2006; Lee and Ha, 2018; Scheinbaum and Wang, 2018), dependence (Perrone et al , 2003; McEvily and Marcus, 2005), cost (Macduffie, 1995; Krause et al , 2006), quality (Krause et al , 2006; Badawi and Battor, 2020), delivery (Krause et al , 2006), flexibility (Krause et al , 2006) and innovativeness (Koufteros et al , 2006; Li et al , 2016)] were measured using a five-item scale adapted according to the sources presented in Table 2. Figure 3 shows the supposed influence of the dependence between the actions of the relational SC on the buyer’s OP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another key feature of social capital, particularly in SC, is that its presence encourages member trust and commitment through facilitating regular communication, cooperative teamwork and/or resource sharing (Gölgeci and Kuivalainen, 2020). It is a dynamic concept that can be a function of direct and/or indirect relationships between parties (Toth et al , 2021), in which its various elements have the potential to impact individual and organizational performance (Swanson et al , 2020; Ye et al , 2023). We anticipate that the existence of social capital will be particularly valuable in GI networks because it helps each party address their shared goals (Lee et al , 2023) and mitigate opportunism within the network (Mungra and Yadav, 2023).…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This declining manufacturing operational performance phenomenon occurs because the company can grow the influence of competitiveness with companies engaged in the same field, both domestic and foreign manufacturing companies. On this basis, Tóth et al (2021) put forward the theory of operational performance that the quality of output determines competitive operational performance, production costs, speed of delivery, the flexibility of the production system, and design quality determine the operational success of the company. This indicates that the problem of manufacturing operational performance needs to be addressed by improving the company's existence to compete with domestic and foreign companies and improve operational performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%