The 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE EDUCATION (ICoMSE) 2020: Innovative Research in Science and Mathema 2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0043439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The strategies and errors of high school students’ in solving logarithmic inequalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students do not really calculate the numbers but only pay attention to the positive and negative sign in number line (Figure 6). The way to solve that problem similar with research results by (Musafir & Susiswo, 2021) There is possibility that the students do not really check the value of 𝑥 in each interval, instead they only checks for one interval and conclude that the next or previous interval would have the opposite conclusion. Even though many students answered correctly, there were still errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Students do not really calculate the numbers but only pay attention to the positive and negative sign in number line (Figure 6). The way to solve that problem similar with research results by (Musafir & Susiswo, 2021) There is possibility that the students do not really check the value of 𝑥 in each interval, instead they only checks for one interval and conclude that the next or previous interval would have the opposite conclusion. Even though many students answered correctly, there were still errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Besides the low understanding of the problem, errors in the mathematical literacy process were caused by misunderstanding the solution strategy. Based on research, Musafir and Susiswo (2021), several factors caused errors in using strategy in problem-solving. They were misconceptions, incorrect procedures, technical errors, and writing mistakes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there were still some errors in the conclusion step. Based on Musafir and Susiswo (2021), this was a technical error since the subject experienced a mistake at the end of the conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%