The strategy implementation process as perceived by different hierarchical levels: The experience of large Croatian enterprises

Abstract

Purpose: Although the implementation process involves employees from different hierarchical levels, previous research on the implementation topic focused mostly on a top management perspective, omitting the perspective of lower hierarchical levels. We believe that employees from different hierarchical levels perceive differently the way the implementation process is carried out because of many intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Considering the primary role of lower hierarchical levels during the implementation process, we decided to include lower levels of management and operatives in our research. Methodology: We investigate the way employees from different hierarchical levels perceive the implementation process. The implementation process in our research was evaluated using four implementation factors: 1) People, 2) Resources allocation, 3) Communication, 4) Operational planning & control. We sent the questionnaire to all large Croatian enterprises (396) and gathered 208 questionnaires from 78 enterprises. Findings: The research findings confirm that the evaluation of key implementation factors differs significantly between hierarchical levels in two of the four identified factors: 1) Communication and 2) Operational planning & control. Frontline managers and operatives mostly consider the instructions for implementing the strategy too vague and unclear, their suggestions not taken into account, the communication generally too slow, what creates confusion and reduces the efficiency in coordinating operational tasks and introducing potential changes. Implications for theory and practice: Although we proved the statistically different perception about two out of four implementation factors, we contributed in a way to point out that this stream of research, with multiple factors and multiple respondents from different hierarchical levels, should be taken into consideration in future research about strategy implementation. Top managers should include feedback from lower hierarchical levels in order to grasp the pitfalls of strategy implementation. This study highlights the operational problems that might occur such as vague or slow communication, budget discrepancy, inadequate definition of timeline for activities and its dynamics, and ways to measure performance during strategy implementation. We believe that the research results are beneficial for academics and consultants when creating teaching and training programs for future managers about strategy implementation. Originality and value: Based on the analysis of the literature review and the research findings, we develop a new implementation model with questionnaire to analyze the way employee from different hierarchical levels perceive the implementation process.

Mapping the Terrain of Strategy Implementation: A Scope Review of Empirical Studies From 2014 to 2024

“…The behavior perspective, with its focus on the roles of top and middle managers as pivotal to the implementation process, dominated the studies reviewed. Notably, research by Ivančić, Jelenc, & Mencer (2021) broadened this perspective by also considering employees as key drivers in the implementation process. This inclusion signifies a growing recognition of the comprehensive range of stakeholders involved in effective strategy implementation, beyond traditional management roles.…”

Sustainable Economic Development: A Systematic Literature Review on Global Perspectives and Strategies

“…Moreover, the understanding and approval of key implementation factors are essential, as a failure to comprehend these aspects can lead to prolonged execution timelines and increased costs (Ivančić et al, 2021). The McKinsey 7S model emphasizes the significance of considering multiple factors, such as strategy, structure, systems, staff, skills, style, and shared values, to ensure successful strategy implementation (Mbaka & Mugambi, 2014).…”

Investigation into the Key Barriers to Achieving UK “Construction 2025” Strategy Targets

“…The core of implementing a strategy is to follow a schedule and milestones. The lack of control over the implementation process can lead to failure (Ivančić et al, 2021). The CLC was responsible for monitoring and measuring the progress of the Strategy's targets.…”