“…Table 7: Experimental fatigue data of 30NCD16 (f -1 = 690MPa, t -1 = 428MPa, f 0 = 1090MPa), from Froustey and Lasserr (1989). Table 8: Experimental fatigue data of "Acier doux" (f -1 = 235MPa, t -1 = 137MPa, f 0 = 342MPa), from Nishihara and Kawamoto (1945). Table 9: Experimental fatigue data of 34Cr4 (f -1 = 415MPa, t -1 = 259MPa, f0= 648MPa), from Heidenreich and Zenner (1979 The analysis of results obtained on the comparison between the experimental fatigue limit and the calculated ones obtained from Crossland and Sines fatigue criteria as presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2 showed clearly their poor predictions capacity for stress states presenting mobile principal stress directions; with majority of the error index out of an error interval of 10%.…”