2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The stressor Criterion-A1 and PTSD: A matter of opinion?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
62
1
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
62
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…While Matthiesen and Einarsen (2004) refer to discussions about bullying and A1, Mikkelsen and Einarsen (2002) argue that distress displayed by victims of bullying is not in excess of what might be expected. At the same time there is considerable controversy around the interpretation and definition of the A1 criterion in general (Bedard-Gilligan and Zoellner 2008; Brewin et al 2009;Kraemer et al 2009;Long et al 2008;Van Hooff et al 2009;Weathers and Keane 2007). Bedard-Gilligan and Zoellner (2008) examined three diverse samples to determine the predictive utility of criterion A requirements for PTSD symptoms.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Matthiesen and Einarsen (2004) refer to discussions about bullying and A1, Mikkelsen and Einarsen (2002) argue that distress displayed by victims of bullying is not in excess of what might be expected. At the same time there is considerable controversy around the interpretation and definition of the A1 criterion in general (Bedard-Gilligan and Zoellner 2008; Brewin et al 2009;Kraemer et al 2009;Long et al 2008;Van Hooff et al 2009;Weathers and Keane 2007). Bedard-Gilligan and Zoellner (2008) examined three diverse samples to determine the predictive utility of criterion A requirements for PTSD symptoms.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent article by Van Hooff, McFarlane, Baur, Abraham, and Barnes (2009) highlighted the difficulty in achieving agreement about which events meet the Criterion A1 definition. In our view, continued debates over which events should be in or out of Criterion A1 are likely to prove less productive than continuing to study events and event characteristics that have the highest conditional probability of resulting in PTSD when they occur.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey of Australians likewise revealed that rates of PTSD were higher for non-Criterion A stressors than for Criterion Testing Conceptual Bracket Creep 5 A stressors [10] . A study of American women interviewed about their worst life events indicated that directly experienced non-Criterion A events produced PTSD significantly more often than did directly experienced Criterion A events.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%