2015
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1102337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The stroke impact scale: performance as a quality of life measure in a community-based stroke rehabilitation setting

Abstract: The SIS performed well in a sample of patients undergoing stroke rehabilitation in the community. Our findings suggest that the multidimensionality of the SIS may allow health professionals to track patient progress and tailor rehabilitation interventions to target the dimensions of health that are most important to a patient's overall health and perceived quality of life over time. Implications for Rehabilitation There is an increased need for valid and reliable measures to evaluate the outcomes of patients r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The single index score (15D score), representing the overall HRQoL on a 0-1 scale (1 = full health, 0 = being dead) and the dimension level values, reflecting the goodness of the levels relative to no problems on the dimension ( = 1) and to being dead ( = 0), are calculated from the health state descriptive system using a set of population-based preference or utility weights. In terms of its major properties (reliability, validity, discriminatory power, and responsiveness to change), the 15D compares at least equally with other preference-based generic instruments [11][12][13][14][15]. The 15D has been applied in numerous different patient groups and diseases (http://www.15d-instrument.…”
Section: The 15d Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single index score (15D score), representing the overall HRQoL on a 0-1 scale (1 = full health, 0 = being dead) and the dimension level values, reflecting the goodness of the levels relative to no problems on the dimension ( = 1) and to being dead ( = 0), are calculated from the health state descriptive system using a set of population-based preference or utility weights. In terms of its major properties (reliability, validity, discriminatory power, and responsiveness to change), the 15D compares at least equally with other preference-based generic instruments [11][12][13][14][15]. The 15D has been applied in numerous different patient groups and diseases (http://www.15d-instrument.…”
Section: The 15d Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SIS is a self-reported questionnaire, used to evaluate how the stroke has affected the patient's health and life (24,25). The SIS consist of questions with 5 nominal categories in 8 domains: strength, hand function, ADL and mobility, communication, emotion, memory/thinking, and participation, with a total of 59 questions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-one out of the 30 in the reperfusion-treated group had a VAS-score ≥ 70. having issues with dependency in ADL (Barthel Index) and/or suggested cognitive impairment (MoCA) ( Table III). Ten participants (62.5%) had a MoCA score of 26 or above and were deemed to not have any cognitive impairment, while the remaining 6 participants were assessed as having a cognitive impairment (MoCA score [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Approximately 56% were independent in ADL, with a Barthel Index score of 100.…”
Section: Health-related Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the participation level domain of the ICF model. It has high reliability (Cronbach's α = 0:89) and moderate validity (Spearman's rho = 0:50~0:73) to assess the functional effect of stroke [30]. Patients' ability to use their paretic hands were assessed using the five items "carry heavy objects," "turn a doorknob," "open a can or jar," "tie a shoelace," and "pick up a dime" in the hand function domain of the SIS.…”
Section: Motor Activity Logmentioning
confidence: 99%