2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1318-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The strong ion gap does not have prognostic value in critically ill patients in a mixed medical/surgical adult ICU

Abstract: Traditional indices of SBE, BE(UA,) lactate, pH, AG, and APACHE II all discriminated well between survivors and non-survivors. In this group of patients the SIG, SIDeff, and SIGapp appear to offer no advantage in prediction of outcome and their use as prognostic markers can therefore not be advocated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
4
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
74
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results contradicts the findings of Ratanarat et al as in their study they have found that in comparison to traditional approach, the Stewart approach does not provide any greater advantage to predict mortality in critically ill patients [28]. Cusack et al findings were also similar to our study, as they also have found that SBE, BE (UA,) lactate, pH and AG have the best ability to measure the outcome [29].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Our results contradicts the findings of Ratanarat et al as in their study they have found that in comparison to traditional approach, the Stewart approach does not provide any greater advantage to predict mortality in critically ill patients [28]. Cusack et al findings were also similar to our study, as they also have found that SBE, BE (UA,) lactate, pH and AG have the best ability to measure the outcome [29].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Induction, time point of inducing anesthesia; weaning, 5 min after weaning from CPB; closure, time point of chest closure; UMA, unmeasured anions; Change in lactate induction-weaning, change in the lactate level from induction to CPB weaning; Change in lactate weaning-closure, change in the lactate level from CPB weaning to chest closure; Change in lactate induction-closure, change in the lactate level from induction to chest closure; Change in UMA induction-weaning, change in the UMA level from induction to CPB weaning; Change in UMA weaning-closure, change in the UMA level from CPB weaning to chest closure; Change in UMA induction-closure, change in the UMA level from induction to chest closure; AUC, area under curve; Pauc, P value of the comparison of AUCs between lactate and UMA at each time point. pediatric cardiac surgery in some studies (Durward et al 2005;Murray et al 2007), whereas other studies showed that the UMA level offers no additional advantage over the lactate level in predicting surgical outcomes (Cusack et al 2002;Hatherill et al 2003;Rocktaeschel et al 2003). Both of these reports focused on postoperative or critically ill patients in the ICU.…”
Section: Fig 3 Periopetraive Hemodynamic Variables In the Mae Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another report suggests that an elevated strong ion gap is superior to lactate levels as a predictor of mortality after cardiac surgery (Durward et al 2005). However, some reports have questioned the role of the UMA level as a predictor of outcome in critically ill patients (Cusack et al 2002;Hatherill et al 2003;Rocktaeschel et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hand, it provides no detailed knowledge on the source of the problem [2]. The SBE is a calculated figure, derived from PaCO2 and arterial pH, whose calculation assumes normal plasma protein and electrolyte contents [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%