2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2005.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The strong law of large numbers for dependent random variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This theorem does not need any restrictions on the dependence structure of random variables and b n is not assumed to satisfy any regularity conditions. As a result of this theorem, Fazekas and Klesov (2001) explored some strong laws of large numbers for martingales and r-mixing sequences, then Kuczmaszewska (2005) proved a strong law of large numbers for negatively associated sequences and extended the result to r-mixing sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theorem does not need any restrictions on the dependence structure of random variables and b n is not assumed to satisfy any regularity conditions. As a result of this theorem, Fazekas and Klesov (2001) explored some strong laws of large numbers for martingales and r-mixing sequences, then Kuczmaszewska (2005) proved a strong law of large numbers for negatively associated sequences and extended the result to r-mixing sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inequality (11) was obtained by Matu la [22] for p = 2. Kuczmaszewska [18] obtained for negatively associated zero mean random variables X 1 , . .…”
Section: Some Basic Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the general Theorem 2, Kuczmaszewska [18] obtained SLLN's for certain dependent random variables. She presented an SLLN for negatively associated sequences.…”
Section: Proofs Of Slln'smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…sequences of random variables has been generalized into several directions. It has, for example, been generalized for pairwise independent, identically distributed random variables in [1], for nonnegative random variables in [2], for dependent, mixing random variables in [3,4], and for pairwise uncorrelated random variables in [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%