1934
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.20.5.291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Strontium II and Barium II Spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1938
1938
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…39 Wavelengths for Ba II are in Table 4. They include wavelengths observed in emission by Karlsson and Litzén, 2 Saunders et al, 37 and Rasmussen. 36 Intensities are given for lines observed by Karlsson and Litzén, who noted the anamolous intensities of lines observed by Rasmussen.…”
Section: Ba IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Wavelengths for Ba II are in Table 4. They include wavelengths observed in emission by Karlsson and Litzén, 2 Saunders et al, 37 and Rasmussen. 36 Intensities are given for lines observed by Karlsson and Litzén, who noted the anamolous intensities of lines observed by Rasmussen.…”
Section: Ba IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bimodal solutions were first found to occur naturally in the nf series of Ba + by Connerade and Mansfield (1975). They were shown to account for an anomalous variation of the quantum defect which had initially been described by Saunders et al (1934) as a perturbation of a novel type, but had never properly been accounted for. Another important aspect of bimodal solutions is the ease with which the self-consistent field procedure may 'flip' from one solution to another, leading to ambiguities in the interpretation of Koopman's theorem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I now turn to an experimental effect originally noticed by Saunders et al a very long time ago [5] based on experiments by Rasmussen [6]. What they realized was that there exists, in the nf Rydberg series of Ba + , a very unusual perturbation, despite the absence of any plausible perturber in the vicinity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%