2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2018.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structural capacity of laminated timber compression elements in fire: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These parameters are only valid for heating but could benefit from extension to capture the decay phase. In our simulations charring during the decay phase is small (< 6 mm) while Wiesner and Bisby [49] observed significant charring ($ 20 mm). We attribute this discrepancy to the difference in set-up (column vs. slab, and enclosed vs. open furnace), the cooling time (2-3 min vs. 33 min), and different oxygen flow conditions (8 vs. 21% Oxygen).…”
Section: Comparison Of Non-uniform and Traditional Design Firescontrasting
confidence: 42%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These parameters are only valid for heating but could benefit from extension to capture the decay phase. In our simulations charring during the decay phase is small (< 6 mm) while Wiesner and Bisby [49] observed significant charring ($ 20 mm). We attribute this discrepancy to the difference in set-up (column vs. slab, and enclosed vs. open furnace), the cooling time (2-3 min vs. 33 min), and different oxygen flow conditions (8 vs. 21% Oxygen).…”
Section: Comparison Of Non-uniform and Traditional Design Firescontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…In order to account for the strength decay ahead of the char front, one adds 7 mm to the char depth in the calculation. These 7 mm are called the zero-strength layer, but the thickness of the layer has been questioned recently [49]. Implicitly, the 7 mm zero-strength layer assumes that the temperature rise beyond 7 mm from the char front is small so that the strength loss is small.…”
Section: Discussion On Zero-strength Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harry Ga erer (2017) and Muthmainnah (2014) study tested various cross-laminated timbers for the structural columns and wooden panels. e results showed that the materials were relatively poor in resisting any re occurrences as the behavior of the adhesive used to bind cross-laminated is prone to cause res [17,18]…”
Section: Fig 5 Cross-section Of Glulam Beam; (A) Longitudinal Crossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to many advanced mechanical properties, the engineered timber products such as Cross-Laminated Timber and Structural Composite Lumber can be used as primary structural materials for the construction of medium-height tall buildings [3]. Intensive research has been conducted to enable engineered wood for high-rise buildings in both structural aspects [4][5][6][7][8][9], as well as fire characteristics [1,2,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%