2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.02.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structural, elastic and electronic properties of marcasite FeS 2 under pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The orthorhombic system has 9 independent values for elastic constants and 3 for dielectric constants which reflects anisotropic properties. Elastic properties from classical simulations are in very good agreement with DFT/PBE+U calculations 12,15 and experiment (bulk modulus B of 146. The mineral is then easiest to distort upon a shear stress rather than compression.…”
Section: Bulksupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The orthorhombic system has 9 independent values for elastic constants and 3 for dielectric constants which reflects anisotropic properties. Elastic properties from classical simulations are in very good agreement with DFT/PBE+U calculations 12,15 and experiment (bulk modulus B of 146. The mineral is then easiest to distort upon a shear stress rather than compression.…”
Section: Bulksupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This mineral is anisotropic 9,10 and decomposes more easily than pyrite by surface attack 11 . Some potential applications have been proposed for lithium and sodium batteries 12,13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we collected too few datasets to reliably fit a third order EoS, it can be inferred from the plot in Figure 4 that a third order EoS might be more appropriate to describe the compressibility of this material, data in the low-pressure range fall below the blue curve whereas the highest pressure datapoint falls above the curve. Also, values significantly larger than 4 for the first derivative of the bulk modulus, K0′, have been suggested for FeS2 marcasite [25] and several other marcasite-type chalcogenides. Fixing K0′ to 4.6, a value that both leads to best fitting and is close to the value in marcasite, and using the third-order Birch-Murnaghan EoS results in a K0 of 114.1 GPa.…”
Section: High Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we collected too few datasets to reliably fit a third order EoS, it can be inferred from the plot in Fig. .4 that a third order EoS might be more appropriate to describe the compressibility of this material, and indeed values significantly larger than 4 for K 0 ' have been suggested for FeS 2 marcasite [25] and several other marcasite-type chalcogenides. Fixing K 0 ' to 4.6, a value that both leads to best fitting and is close to the value in marcasite, and using the third-order Birch−Murnaghan EoS results in a K 0 of 114.1 GPa.…”
Section: High Pressurementioning
confidence: 98%