2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structural equivalence of tourism cooperative network in the Belt and Road Initiative Area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the cities of the central region were more developed tourism economies of the cohesive type, the southern region contained more outward-looking cities with high external dependence, while the northern region had mostly the isolated type with little or no effective cooperation. Compared with previous studies that were mostly based on tourism economic linkages to construct tourism cooperation networks [42,43,54], weighted and undirected, and only explore the relationship characteristics [46][47][48], this study argues that tourism cooperation should also take into account the attribute characteristics of destinations themselves and identify the directional variability of cooperative linkages. Areas with better tourism resource endowment are more likely to attract tourists, which in turn will be tourist destinations to a greater extent in the cooperative relationship [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, the cities of the central region were more developed tourism economies of the cohesive type, the southern region contained more outward-looking cities with high external dependence, while the northern region had mostly the isolated type with little or no effective cooperation. Compared with previous studies that were mostly based on tourism economic linkages to construct tourism cooperation networks [42,43,54], weighted and undirected, and only explore the relationship characteristics [46][47][48], this study argues that tourism cooperation should also take into account the attribute characteristics of destinations themselves and identify the directional variability of cooperative linkages. Areas with better tourism resource endowment are more likely to attract tourists, which in turn will be tourist destinations to a greater extent in the cooperative relationship [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…With the introduction of Social Network Analysis (SNA), this provided a new perspective for the study of tourism cooperation network, and quantitative spatial research to explore the characteristics of spatial network structure began to emerge. The mainstream research idea is to conduct threshold processing on the basic coefficient matrix, convert it into a binary matrix, and then measure network density, network type, node centrality, and cohesive subgroups with numerical values, to explore the node status and overall pattern of the cooperative network from both the overall and individual aspects [46][47][48]. It is an important contribution to the analysis of the tourism level of each node, the tourism development links between nodes, and the future direction of regional cooperation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that tourism in Central Asia is considered to be both more distance-and price-elastic. Bai et al [48] constructed the Belt and Road International Tourism Cooperation Network (ITCN) based on the perspective of tourism economic cooperation and further found, using social network analysis, that Eastern Europe, North Asia Pacific and South Asia are at the core of the network, while the Middle East, the Americas and Africa are at the periphery of the network.…”
Section: Spatial Network Structure Of Tourism Economy In Tourist Dest...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the promotion of this initiative, countries and regions along the "Belt and Road" will enjoy an orderly and free flow of economic factors, efficient allocation of resources, and deep market integration, effectively promoting coordinated and linked development between countries and bilateral exchanges of people, as well as promoting the development of tourism industry [5][6]. In terms of international tourism trips worldwide, the countries along the Belt and Road account for 44%, while domestic tourism in the countries along the Belt and Road accounts for 80% of the domestic tourism trips worldwide, and the Belt and Road tourism market has great potential [7]. Due to the impact of the new epidemic, China's inbound tourism has been greatly affected, but from the data before the epidemic, China's inbound tourism has developed rapidly [8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%