2014
DOI: 10.5334/2014-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Structure and Characteristics of #PhDChat, an Emergent Online Social Network

Abstract: #PhDChat is an online network of individuals that has its roots to a group of UK doctoral students who began using Twitter in 2010 to hold discussions. Since then, the network around #PhDchat has evolved and grown. In this study, we examine this network using a mixed methods analysis of the tweets that were labeled with the hashtag over a one-month period. Our goal is to understand the structure and characteristics of this network, to draw conclusions about who belongs to this network, and to explore what the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While by no means comparable to larger online communities, by the end of its first year of operation, #ECRchat had established itself as a part of the online ecology of academia (see for example inclusion in surveys by Ford, Veletsianos, & Resta, 2014;Gibson & Gibbs, 2013). There were over 400 unique participants during live chats (not including use of the hashtag at other times), which the literature on online participation suggests is likely to be only a fraction of the overall audience.…”
Section: #Ecrchat Support and Knowledge Sharingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…While by no means comparable to larger online communities, by the end of its first year of operation, #ECRchat had established itself as a part of the online ecology of academia (see for example inclusion in surveys by Ford, Veletsianos, & Resta, 2014;Gibson & Gibbs, 2013). There were over 400 unique participants during live chats (not including use of the hashtag at other times), which the literature on online participation suggests is likely to be only a fraction of the overall audience.…”
Section: #Ecrchat Support and Knowledge Sharingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Guidry and Pasquini (2013) shared the #sachat case study of student affairs educators using a hashtag for nonformal learning during weekly moderated chats and nonscheduled chat time to discuss trends, issues, and ideas for campus support services. Ford, Veletsianos, and Resta (2014) investigated an emergent social network, #PhDChat, and found that this organic community offers social and emotional advice, support, and resources for doctoral scholars. The learning and teaching in higher education chat (#LTHEchat) refers to synchronized Twitter discussions, facilitated by a guest moderator, that involve a variety of pedagogical topics and instructional themes each week (Beckingham, Nerantzi, Reed, & Walker, 2015).…”
Section: Professional Networked Practices On Twittermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to researchers of previous studies (Beckingham et al, 2015;Ford et al, 2014;Gao & Li, 2017;Guidry & Pasquini, 2013;Veletsianos, 2017), we focused on the way academic advising professionals use a hashtag to conduct a synchronous Twitter chat and support a distributed network, that is, an interconnected group designed to share resources and accomplish a common goal, typically structured through Internet-based computing, for professional development. To better understand knowledge sharing and professional development activities of postsecondary educators on social media, we needed to see the way platforms are embedded into work-life experiences and practices over time.…”
Section: Professional Networked Practices On Twittermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, researchers explore support possibilities available on the Internet. Examples of this type of support are online communities, such as the #PhDChat generated on Twitter (Ford, Veletsianos, and Resta 2014), or specific communities, for instance CoVIF (a learning 2 Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2019, 27: 2271 -http://dx.doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2271 (page number not for citation purpose) community for researchers in training in the field of educational technology; Moreno and Salinas 2011). The use of Open Educational Resources (OER) as a possible source of content has not yet been exploited to address the shortcomings or the need to deepen knowledge in certain aspects of research training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%