2022
DOI: 10.1002/asi.24721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure and priorities of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities: A case of institutional research information management system

Abstract: Research information management systems (RIMS) have become critical components of information technology infrastructure on university campuses. They are used not just for sharing and promoting faculty research, but also for conducting faculty evaluation and development, facilitating research collaborations, identifying mentors for student projects, and expert consultants for local businesses. This study is one of the first empirical investigations of the structure of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cheek and Øby, 2019;Greifeneder et al, 2018;Kjellberg et al, 2016;Muscanell and Utz, 2017;Marshall, 2015;Zhang and Li, 2020;Sugimoto et al, 2017). Lee et al (2023) point out how previous studies of research information management systems (RIMS) have been conducted with non-institutional systems, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, Mendeley, ORCID and Google Scholar. Therefore, a gap exists when it comes to focussing on the context of workplace-related researcher web profiles and how this context affects researchers' motivation to add content to university-provided profile pages in RIMS.…”
Section: Researchers' Use Of Academic Web Profiles 1285mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cheek and Øby, 2019;Greifeneder et al, 2018;Kjellberg et al, 2016;Muscanell and Utz, 2017;Marshall, 2015;Zhang and Li, 2020;Sugimoto et al, 2017). Lee et al (2023) point out how previous studies of research information management systems (RIMS) have been conducted with non-institutional systems, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, Mendeley, ORCID and Google Scholar. Therefore, a gap exists when it comes to focussing on the context of workplace-related researcher web profiles and how this context affects researchers' motivation to add content to university-provided profile pages in RIMS.…”
Section: Researchers' Use Of Academic Web Profiles 1285mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2017). Lee et al. (2023) point out how previous studies of research information management systems (RIMS) have been conducted with non-institutional systems, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, Mendeley, ORCID and Google Scholar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%