2018
DOI: 10.1080/00288306.2018.1520265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure and seismic potential of the Aotea and Evans Bay faults, Wellington, New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also evident that better and more comprehensive characterisation of soil and rock shear wave velocity (and other properties) is necessary within the Wellington region in order to maximise the utility of numerical simulations and better understand previous empirical observations. For example, it should be noted that the 2D model domain passes through the Aotea Fault [29], though the effects of this fault on the basin geometry are not considered in the current study. The Semmens et al [9] basin model that informs the 2D models developed here did not make consideration for the portion of the Aotea Fault that impacts the model domain, and the recentlypublished update of the Semmens et al model by Kaiser et al [30] was not published at the time that the 2D model development was undertaken for this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also evident that better and more comprehensive characterisation of soil and rock shear wave velocity (and other properties) is necessary within the Wellington region in order to maximise the utility of numerical simulations and better understand previous empirical observations. For example, it should be noted that the 2D model domain passes through the Aotea Fault [29], though the effects of this fault on the basin geometry are not considered in the current study. The Semmens et al [9] basin model that informs the 2D models developed here did not make consideration for the portion of the Aotea Fault that impacts the model domain, and the recentlypublished update of the Semmens et al model by Kaiser et al [30] was not published at the time that the 2D model development was undertaken for this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slow slip events FIGURE 1 Tectonic setting of New Zealand showing plate boundary components and motion rates (DeMets et al, 1990;DeMets et al, 1994;DeMets et al, 2010), and Hikurangi subduction interface coupling of the North Island -regions in blue are weakly coupled (undergoing aseismic slow slip), regions in red are fully elastically coupled (locked) (from Wallace et al, 2012). Also shown are active crustal faults (red lines) (onshore faults from the New Zealand Community Fault Model (NZ CFM) - Seebeck et al, 2022; offshore active faults from Barnes and Audru, 1999;Barnes et al, 2002;Nodder et al, 2007;Mountjoy et al, 2009;Barnes et al, 2010;Pondard and Barnes, 2010;Mountjoy and Barnes, 2011;Barnes et al, 2019;.…”
Section: Tectonic Uplift Processes At Subduction Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%