2011
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure of cross-cultural musical diversity

Abstract: Human cultural traits, such as languages, musics, rituals and material objects, vary widely across cultures. However, the majority of comparative analyses of human cultural diversity focus on between-culture variation without consideration for within-culture variation. In contrast, biological approaches to genetic diversity, such as the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) framework, partition genetic diversity into both within-and between-population components. We attempt here for the first time to quantify… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
75
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
75
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, our approach tracks the cultural entities themselves, in effect treating individual folktale variants in ethnolinguistic groups like population geneticists treat genetically distinct haploid organisms in biological populations. Rzeszutek et al [38] used a similar approach in their analysis of Formosan song variants, although, interestingly, our estimate of between-population variation is closer to Bell et al's 8 per cent than Rzeszutek et al's 2 per cent (see §3d for a possible explanation for this).…”
Section: Results and Discussion (A) Population Structuresupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Instead, our approach tracks the cultural entities themselves, in effect treating individual folktale variants in ethnolinguistic groups like population geneticists treat genetically distinct haploid organisms in biological populations. Rzeszutek et al [38] used a similar approach in their analysis of Formosan song variants, although, interestingly, our estimate of between-population variation is closer to Bell et al's 8 per cent than Rzeszutek et al's 2 per cent (see §3d for a possible explanation for this).…”
Section: Results and Discussion (A) Population Structuresupporting
confidence: 57%
“…If so, cultural F ST or F ST values may be particularly sensitive to the geographical scale of the population being sampled. This may help to explain why the cultural F ST values from this study, drawn from large European language groups, and cultural F ST values from countries around the globe [28] are four times larger than the cultural F ST values from the considerably more localized Formosan-speaking groups [38]. Recently, empirical data on cultural and genetic F ST values have been applied to debates about the units of selection in human evolution [28].…”
Section: (C) Ethnolinguistic Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intriguing patterns are emerging from the increasing numbers of studies using phylogenetic approaches to characterize cultural evolution [4,[9][10][11][12][13][14]. While many studies have identified cultural traits which are predominantly vertically or horizontally inherited, we develop a method able to elucidate the effects of the environment while acknowledging both of these evolutionary processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They conclude that "the correlation between music and genes was statistically significant" and that "music -particularly polyphonic group singing -might serve as a useful marker to study human migrations and human origins more generally" (p. 4). In a related study, Rzeszutek et al (2012) argue that "many useful parallels have been drawn between cultural and biological evolution", but add that "the forces shaping cultural diversity can differ markedly from those that drive the structure of genetic diversity" (p. 1611). A similar note of caution is provided by Savage and Brown (2013).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysis and Ancestral Rhythmsmentioning
confidence: 99%