2015
DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2015.1101365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Structure of Historical Inquiry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The triad of history from Nordgren [48] is borrowed to communicate the information. Additionally, to organize and present the findings, the three features of history inquisition proposed by Retz [53] is used. In this way, both frameworks are utilized and combined for a thorough critical analysis.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The triad of history from Nordgren [48] is borrowed to communicate the information. Additionally, to organize and present the findings, the three features of history inquisition proposed by Retz [53] is used. In this way, both frameworks are utilized and combined for a thorough critical analysis.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For historical consciousness, the process through which the study's historical culture is understood, it is helpful to turn to Retz's [53] history inquisition features through which he declares that historical researchers must be able to study the past as something that presents itself to be understood as a world of meaning outside of the inquirers themselves.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…J. Clark & Nye, 2017;Lee, 1983;Retz, 2016b), i.e., it is hard to specify one particular model of historical thinking that encompasses the diverse and sometimes conflicting approaches to history in the academic community (cf. Levisohn, 2017).…”
Section: What Does It Mean To Think Historically?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is a rather broad variety of research on historical thinking that results in differing approaches to the concept, we can say that at the most fundamental level historical thinking deals with the notion that the past is qualitatively different and distinct from the present (cf. Retz, 2016b;Wineburg, 2001). This difference then causes epistemological concerns relating to how we can come to know that past.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%