2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6028(00)00873-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure of oxygen on Cu(1 0 0) at low and high coverages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…59 Ultimately, they may lead to the growth of perpendicular structural domains, as frequently observed on Cu(100)-O. [35][36][37][38][39][40] Due to minimal displacement of oxygen atoms (≈1 pm, in contrast to ≈40 pm vertical displacement near type I defects), oxygen-sensitive force images do not directly reveal the presence of any of these defects. As demonstrated with these results, the capacity to uncover novel information by combining images obtained simultaneously through different contrast mechanisms, which helped to identify the surface defect in this study, is a major advantage of multichannel imaging techniques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…59 Ultimately, they may lead to the growth of perpendicular structural domains, as frequently observed on Cu(100)-O. [35][36][37][38][39][40] Due to minimal displacement of oxygen atoms (≈1 pm, in contrast to ≈40 pm vertical displacement near type I defects), oxygen-sensitive force images do not directly reveal the presence of any of these defects. As demonstrated with these results, the capacity to uncover novel information by combining images obtained simultaneously through different contrast mechanisms, which helped to identify the surface defect in this study, is a major advantage of multichannel imaging techniques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this one monolayer thick reconstruction, oxygen atoms are located nearly co-planar with the copper atoms. 35,36 Thereby, the two chemical species feature strikingly different structural arrangements: One-third of the copper atoms (Cu1) are located in the centers of the filled rows on the surface, whereas the remaining Cu atoms (Cu2) are on the edges of filled rows. In contrast, oxygen (O) atoms are arranged in rectangles of equal height parallel to the missing rows (3.6 Å), but alternating width (3.5 Å and 3.7 Å, respectively) perpendicular to them due to a lateral relaxation towards the missing rows.…”
Section: A Sample Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These structural models succeeded in describing specific situations in terms of the static positions of the adsorbates that were often assumed rigid spheres. The general characteristics of electronic structures and atomic arrangement on a variety of metal oxide surfaces have been now fairly determined [19,20]. There have been many landmark reviews on the progress in this field published recent years [14,16,19,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]].…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Their finding that the MRR is initiated from these c(2 × 2) domains has been supported by experimental and computational studies. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Despite numerous investigations, the mechanism for the transformation between the MRR and Cu 2 O is not clear. Using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), x-ray induced Auger electron spectroscopy (XAES), and STM, Lampimaki…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%