2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab718e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Structure of Radiatively Inefficient Black Hole Accretion Flows

Abstract: We run three long-timescale general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of radiatively inefficient accretion flows onto non-rotating black holes. Our aim is to achieve steady-state behavior out to large radii and understand the resulting flow structure. A simulation with adiabatic index Γ = 4/3 and small initial alternating poloidal magnetic field loops is run to a time of 440,000 GM/c 3 , reaching inflow equilibrium inside a radius of 370 GM/c 2 . Variations with larger alternating field loops and wi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have also run sample MAD and SANE simulations to long durations, similar to what was done by Narayan et al (2012) and White et al (2020b). Averaged properties of those simulations over various time intervals are listed in Table 2 and Table 3.…”
Section: Long Duration Runs and Inflow Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also run sample MAD and SANE simulations to long durations, similar to what was done by Narayan et al (2012) and White et al (2020b). Averaged properties of those simulations over various time intervals are listed in Table 2 and Table 3.…”
Section: Long Duration Runs and Inflow Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyse the accretion rate data from five different simulations of ADAFs, which were initiated using different initial conditions and were performed using different GRMHD codes. While we performed simulation D in the interest of this work, simulations A, B, and C were taken from White et al (2020), while simulation R comes from Narayan et al (2012). In this section, we briefly describe the numerical set-ups of each simulation and discuss their key differences.…”
Section: E S C R I P T I O N O F S I M U L At I O N Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just the difference in causes a much more spherical distribution of mass in simulation C compared to simulations A and B that present a more standard disc picture, with high density near the equatorial region and low density close to the polar region. Further details of these simulations are provided in White et al (2020).…”
Section: Simulations a B And Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theories indicate that LLAGN are characterized by a low accretion rate ( ṁ) and/or low radiative efficiency (Ho 1999;Panessa et al 2007). In models of radiatively inefficient accretion flows (RIAFs; Narayan & Yi 1994Yuan, Bu & Wu 2012a;Yuan, Wu & Bu 2012b;White, Quataert & Gammie 2020), the kinetic energy is either advected with the gas into the SMBH or channelled into an outflow. The magnetic field combined with 'puffed-up' geometrically thick structures could provide a plausible mechanism for collimating axial outflows, accounting for a large fraction of observed jets in LLAGN (Maoz 2007;Mezcua & Prieto 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%