1996
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(96)00822-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure of sulphur adsorption phases on Ni(111) studied by X-ray standing wavefield absorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the favorable site in the other systems have corresponded with the metal bulk structure. On Ru(0 0 0 1) [4] and Re(0 0 0 1) [5] the S adsorption favors the hcp site while on Ni(1 1 1) [6] and Pt(1 1 1) [8] the fcc site. Based on the DFT results the energy minimum for fcc site is only slightly (0.02 eV) lower than that for the hcp site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the favorable site in the other systems have corresponded with the metal bulk structure. On Ru(0 0 0 1) [4] and Re(0 0 0 1) [5] the S adsorption favors the hcp site while on Ni(1 1 1) [6] and Pt(1 1 1) [8] the fcc site. Based on the DFT results the energy minimum for fcc site is only slightly (0.02 eV) lower than that for the hcp site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For catalytic purposes the coverage of 1/4 monolayer (ML) is large, but with low energy electron diffraction (LEED) more sparse structures are hard to analyze. The local (2 · 2) adsorption structure have been resolved on Ru(0 0 0 1) [4], Re(0 0 0 1) [5], Ni(1 1 1) [6,7] and Pt(1 1 1) [8]. The earlier results on close-packed transition metal surfaces indicate that on hcp metals the adsorption site is hcp and with fcc metals the site is fcc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no direct information about the geometry of the adsorbed H 2 S from these experiments to compare with our finding. On Ir(1 1 1) [31], Ni(1 1 1) [32][33][34][35] and Pd(1 1 1) [36][37][38][39][40], previous experimental efforts primarily focused on the sulfidation of the surfaces via room temperature exposure to H 2 S. At this condition, no evidence of molecular adsorption was observed because H 2 S was found to dissociate quickly giving rise to adsorbed S species. To our knowledge, low temperature characterization of H 2 S adsorption on Ir(1 1 1), Ni(1 1 1) and Pd(1 1 1) has never been attempted experimentally.…”
Section: Adsorption Of H 2 S Sh S and H On The Metal Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These efforts have included work on close-packed surfaces of transition (Co(0 0 0 1) [9], Ru(0 0 0 1) [27][28][29][30], Ir(1 1 1) [31], Ni(1 1 1) [32][33][34][35], Pd(1 1 1) [36][37][38][39][40], Pt(1 1 1) [41][42][43][44], Rh(1 1 1) [45][46][47]) and noble metals (Ag(1 1 1) [12,48,49], Au(1 1 1) [50][51][52], Cu(1 1 1) [53][54][55]). The formation of ( p 3 Â p 3) R30°structure on the (1 1 1) surfaces was frequently observed while the (2 Â 2) structure was commonly reported on the (0 0 0 1) face.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike our PhD measurements, however, SEXAFS does not offer chemical-state specificity, so the measured spectra are some weighted average of the individual SEXAFS from the co-adsorbed S-containing surface species. Atomic S occupies hollow sites on Ni(111) [20] that are significantly closer to the surface than is S in SO 2 , leading to a much-increased S-Ni bond angle relative to the surface normal of ~42°. As a result, the true value of the S-Ni bond angle for the SO 2 species will be smaller than the 'average' value of 35° inferred from the SEXAFS data, by an amount that depends on the relative coverage of atomic S.…”
Section: Somentioning
confidence: 99%