1980
DOI: 10.1109/tem.1980.6447413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure of the firm and the adoption of process innovations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These organizations are expected to be more open to newer medical practices (Glassman, 1995;McGill, Slocum, & Lei, 1992). (3) Formalization, defined as the extent to which rules and procedures govern employee and organizational activities, can be measured by the presence of rule manuals and job descriptions (Damanpour, 1991;Cohn & Turyn, 1980). Formal and inflexible environments are hypothesized to stifle creativity and alienate workers (Adler & Borys, 1996), thereby hindering staff impetus to learn about, and subsequently adopt, new medical procedures (Bailyn, 1985;Raelin, 1985).…”
Section: Internal Organizational Structure and The Adoption Of Hiv Tementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These organizations are expected to be more open to newer medical practices (Glassman, 1995;McGill, Slocum, & Lei, 1992). (3) Formalization, defined as the extent to which rules and procedures govern employee and organizational activities, can be measured by the presence of rule manuals and job descriptions (Damanpour, 1991;Cohn & Turyn, 1980). Formal and inflexible environments are hypothesized to stifle creativity and alienate workers (Adler & Borys, 1996), thereby hindering staff impetus to learn about, and subsequently adopt, new medical procedures (Bailyn, 1985;Raelin, 1985).…”
Section: Internal Organizational Structure and The Adoption Of Hiv Tementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When Nohria and Gulati (1996) took such an approach, innovation did not correlate significantly with centralization, yet centralization was found to correlate significantly and negatively with process innovation by Cohn and Turyn (1980). The method employed by Nohria and Gulati may identify the most gross organizational relations to innovation in general, but it fails to give proper credence to the role that innovation type plays in determining the successful adoption of innovation in organizations (Miller and Friesen, 1982;Tornatzky and Klein, 1982).…”
Section: A Multidimensional Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several empirical studies it has been found that the concentration of technical specialists R&D Management 114, 1983 promotes process innovation adoption (Duchesneau et al, 1979; Ettlie and Bridges, 1982; Cohn and Turyn, 1980; Bigoness and Perreault, 1981). There are a number of theoretical rationales for these findings.…”
Section: Concentration Of Technical Specialists and Diversijkation Stmentioning
confidence: 99%