“…In particular, this has required analysis of working class mobilization by populist regimes, and how working class militancy has been variously manipulated and contained by populist leaderships and/or more reactionary forms of corporate state. At one level, this has led to a focus upon trade union organization (labour bureaucracy, 'paralell' union structures, and pervasively, a lack of rank and file democracy) and structural ties of unions with the state; at another, more advanced level, it has led to attempts to establish relationships between trade union developments and forms of state required by the changing nature of local economies' insertion into the global system, (there being a detectable shift away from 'welfare populism'--which facilitated the development of national capitals on the basis of expanding domestic markets-to more regressive regimes (often military dictatorships) associated with the postwar inflow of foreign capital oriented to export-led growth) (Almeida and Lowy, 1976;Epstein, 1979;Harding and Spalding 1976;Moises 1979). Furthermore, as illustrated by the Chilean and Cuban experiences particularly, mobilization of the working class may proceed beyond the structural limits established by reformist unionist leaderships to more radical forms of political action (Erickson, Peppe and Spalding, 1974;Jelin, 1979;Petras, 1970;Spalding, 1979;Winn, 1973).…”